People v. Anderson

237 A.D.2d 989, 655 N.Y.S.2d 220, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3652
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedMarch 14, 1997
StatusPublished
Cited by6 cases

This text of 237 A.D.2d 989 (People v. Anderson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. Anderson, 237 A.D.2d 989, 655 N.Y.S.2d 220, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3652 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1997).

Opinion

Order unanimously reversed on the law, motion denied, indictment reinstated and matter remitted to Monroe County Court for further proceedings on the indictment. Memorandum: County Court erred in dismissing the indictment against both defendants on the ground that the Special Assistant District Attorney who presented the matter to the Grand Jury had not been duly appointed pursuant to County Law §§702 and 825 and, thus, the Grand Jury proceeding was defective because an improper person was present (see, CPL 190.25 [3]). The record establishes that the Monroe County District Attorney formally appointed Van Henri White to serve as a Special Assistant District Attorney, that White took the oath of office to serve in that capacity, and that the appointment was filed with the Monroe County Clerk, thereby substantially complying with the statutory appointment powers of the Monroe County District Attorney (see, County Law §§ 702, 825; People v Fuller, 156 Misc 404). The District Attorney may, pursuant to sections 702 and 825, appoint persons employed by other governmental agencies to assist in the prosecution of matters within his jurisdiction and statutory authority (see, 1977 Atty Gen [Inf Opns] 106). Lack of prior authorization from the Board of Supervisors does not impair the validity of that appointment [990]*990where, as here, the appointment does not impose a financial obligation upon the County that would require the Board of Supervisors to appropriate funds for the position. (Appeal from Order of Monroe County Court, Maloy, J.—Dismiss Indictment.) Present—Pine, J. P., Lawton, Doerr, Balio and Boehm, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

People v. Decker
218 A.D.3d 1026 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2023)
People v. Mazzeo
2021 NY Slip Op 01162 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2021)
People v. Ramos
34 Misc. 3d 914 (New York Supreme Court, 2012)
People v. Glanda
5 A.D.3d 945 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2004)
Mileto v. Sleight
178 Misc. 2d 562 (New York Supreme Court, 1998)
People v. Jackson
237 A.D.2d 990 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1997)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
237 A.D.2d 989, 655 N.Y.S.2d 220, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3652, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-anderson-nyappdiv-1997.