People v. Anderson

233 A.D.2d 211, 650 N.Y.S.2d 526, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11797
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Anderson. Read the opinion of the Court — 201 A.D.2d 658

Opinion

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Juanita Bing Newton, J.), rendered October 26, 1992, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of robbery in the second degree, and sentencing him, as a second violent felony offender, to a term of 71/2 to 15 years, unanimously affirmed.

Defendant’s argument that the trial court improperly limited his ability to present a defense by precluding certain questions on cross-examination is unpreserved because he "fail[ed] to place on the record his explanation of the relevance and materiality of his proposed lines of inquiry” (People v Trinidad, 177 AD2d 286, lv denied 79 NY2d 865) and we decline to review it in the interest of justice. Were we to review it, we would find that inquiry into the police failure to conduct additional identification procedures, clearly unnecessary in this case with respect to the testifying witness, was, at the very least, collateral and properly excluded in the court’s discretion. Concur—Sullivan, J. P., Ellerin, Nardelli, Tom and Andrias, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Anderson, 233 A.D.2d 211, 650 N.Y.S.2d 526, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11797 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1996).

233 A.D.2d 211 (People v. Anderson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Trinidad
177 A.D.2d 286 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1991)