People v. Anderson

247 A.D.2d 484, 667 N.Y.S.2d 948, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 999
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Anderson. Read the opinion of the Court — 216 A.D.2d 257

Opinion

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Schulman, J.), rendered December 20, 1995, convicting him of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree and attempted robbery in the third degree, after a non-jury trial, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution (see, People v Contes, 60 NY2d 620), we find that it was legally sufficient to establish the defendant’s guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. Moreover, upon the exercise of our factual review power, we are satisfied that the verdict of guilt-was not against the weight of the evidence (CPL 470.15 [5]).

The sentence imposed was not excessive (see, People v Suitte, 90 AD2d 80, 85).

The defendant’s remaining contention is without merit.

Miller, J. P., Sullivan, Pizzuto and Florio, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Anderson, 247 A.D.2d 484, 667 N.Y.S.2d 948, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 999 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1998).

247 A.D.2d 484 (People v. Anderson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Contes
454 N.E.2d 932 (New York Court of Appeals, 1983)
People v. Suitte
90 A.D.2d 80 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1982)