People v. Anderson
224 A.D.2d 1026, 637 N.Y.S.2d 904, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1726
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Anderson. Read the opinion of the Court — 201 A.D.2d 658 →
Opinion
—Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: County Court dismissed one of four counts against defendant based upon transactional immunity. Because defendant did not give any testimony regarding the other counts before the Grand Jury, he was not entitled to transactional immunity on those counts (see, Matter of Rush v Mordue, 68 NY2d 348, 356; CPL 50.10 [1]). (Appeal from Judgment of Steuben County Court, Brad[1027]*1027street, J. — Grand Larceny, 4th Degree.) Present — Green, J. P., Fallon, Wesley, Davis and Boehm, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
People v. Anderson, 224 A.D.2d 1026, 637 N.Y.S.2d 904, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1726 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1996).
224 A.D.2d 1026 (People v. Anderson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Rush v. Mordue
502 N.E.2d 170 (New York Court of Appeals, 1986)