People v. Anderson

192 A.D.2d 665, 598 N.Y.S.2d 716
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Anderson. Read the opinion of the Court — 168 A.D.2d 624

Opinion

—Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Lonschein, J.), rendered April 9, 1991, convicting him of burglary in the second degree and petit larceny, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

We agree that errors were made by the trial court during the cross-examination of the complaining witness, and during the charge to the jury. However, in light of the strong identification testimony of the complainant, we conclude that the errors, even when considered cumulatively, were harmless (see, People v Crimmins, 36 NY2d 230).

We find that the sentence is not excessive (see, People v Suitte, 90 AD2d 80). Eiber, J. P., O’Brien, Ritter and Copertino, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Anderson, 192 A.D.2d 665, 598 N.Y.S.2d 716 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1993).

192 A.D.2d 665 (People v. Anderson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Crimmins
326 N.E.2d 787 (New York Court of Appeals, 1975)
People v. Suitte
90 A.D.2d 80 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1982)