People ex rel. Beam v. Hodges

286 A.D.2d 936, 731 N.Y.S.2d 416, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9048
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided September 28, 2001·Published·Cited by 11 cases

Opinion

—Judgment unanimously affirmed without costs. Memorandum: Supreme Court properly dismissed the petition seeking a writ of habeas corpus. Petitioner challenges his continued incarceration beyond the date on which he became eligible for conditional release. Petitioner was not released because he failed to comply with the special condition that he secure housing approved by the Division of Parole (Division) prior to his conditional release. Because petitioner is not entitled to immediate release, habeas corpus relief does not lie (see, People ex rel. Travis v Coombe, 219 AD2d 881, 881-882). Further, “[a]l-though this Court has the power to convert a petition for a writ of habeas corpus into a CPLR article 78 petition,” that relief is not appropriate here (People ex rel. Travis v Coombe, supra, at 882). Contrary to petitioner’s contention, “it is within the discretion of the Division to impose the special condition of securing approved housing, even though the condition must be satisfied before his request of conditional release can be granted” (Matter of Monroe v Travis, 280 AD2d 675, 676, lv denied 96 NY2d 714; see, People ex rel. Wilson v Keane, 267 AD2d 686, appeal dismissed 95 NY2d 824). Also contrary to petitioner’s contention, there is no requirement that the special condition of release be filed with the Secretary of State (see, People ex rel. Prince v Meloni, 166 AD2d 926, 927, lv denied IQ NY2d 714). (Appeal from Judgment of Supreme Court, Erie County, Fahey, J. — Habeas Corpus.) Present — Green, J. P., Scudder, Kehoe, Gorski and Lawton, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People ex rel. Beam v. Hodges, 286 A.D.2d 936, 731 N.Y.S.2d 416, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9048 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2001).

286 A.D.2d 936 (People ex rel. Beam v. Hodges) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People ex rel. Lucien v. Superintendent, Fishkill Corr. Facility, N.Y.S. DOCCS
2021 NY Slip Op 00314 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2021)
CARDEW, ROBERT v. FISCHER, BRIAN
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2014
Cardew v. Fischer
115 A.D.3d 1193 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2014)
People ex rel. Dudley v. Unger
57 A.D.3d 1508 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2008)
Lynch v. West
24 A.D.3d 1050 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2005)
People ex rel. Bernzott v. Murray
12 A.D.3d 1102 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2004)
People ex rel. Encarnacion v. McGinnis
2 A.D.3d 933 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2003)
People ex rel. Gloss v. Costello
309 A.D.2d 1160 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2003)
People ex rel. Person v. Beilein
306 A.D.2d 864 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2003)