People ex rel. Gloss v. Costello

309 A.D.2d 1160, 764 N.Y.S.2d 895, 2003 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10032
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedOctober 2, 2003
StatusPublished
Cited by14 cases

This text of 309 A.D.2d 1160 (People ex rel. Gloss v. Costello) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People ex rel. Gloss v. Costello, 309 A.D.2d 1160, 764 N.Y.S.2d 895, 2003 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10032 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2003).

Opinion

Appeal from a judgment (denominated order) of Supreme Court, Oneida County (Parker, J.), entered September 4, 2001, which dismissed the petition for a writ of habeas corpus.

It is hereby ordered that the judgment so appealed from be and the same hereby is unanimously affirmed without costs.

Memorandum: Supreme Court properly dismissed the petition for a writ of habeas corpus because the issues raised therein either were raised or could have been raised on direct appeal or by a postjudgment motion pursuant to CPL article 440 (see People ex rel. Mammarello v Donnelly, 286 AD2d 937 [2001]; People ex rel. Woods v Walker, 283 AD2d 991, 991-992 [2001], appeal dismissed and lv denied 96 NY2d 928 [2001]). Moreover, the court properly dismissed the petition because habeas corpus relief does not lie where petitioner would not be [1161]*1161entitled to immediate release even if his contentions had merit (see People ex rel. Beam v Hodges, 286 AD2d 936, 937 [2001]; Mammarello, 286 AD2d at 937; People ex rel. Santoro v Hollins, 273 AD2d 829 [2000]). Because “the petition ‘lacked any justiciable basis upon which a writ of habeas corpus could be sustained,’ ” the court did not abuse its discretion in denying petitioner’s application for assigned counsel (People ex rel. Brown v Murray, 284 AD2d 987, 988 [2001], quoting People ex rel. Washington v La Vallee, 34 AD2d 603, 603 [1970], lv denied 27 NY2d 481 [1970]). Present — Pigott, Jr., P.J., Green, Gorski, Lawton and Hayes, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

LEWIS, NATHAN v. GRAHAM, HAROLD D.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2012
People ex rel. Lewis v. Graham
96 A.D.3d 1423 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2012)
VAN NORSTRAND, GLENN E. v. GRAHAM, HAROLD D.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2011
People ex rel. Van Norstrand v. Graham
81 A.D.3d 1248 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2011)
People ex rel. McDaniels v. Corcoran
70 A.D.3d 1358 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2010)
People ex rel. Almodovar v. Berbary
67 A.D.3d 1419 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2009)
People ex rel. Hinton v. Graham
66 A.D.3d 1402 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2009)
People ex rel. Dudley v. Unger
57 A.D.3d 1508 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2008)
People ex rel. Forsythe v. Poole
56 A.D.2d 1239 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2008)
People ex rel. Griffin v. New York State Divivision of Parole
55 A.D.3d 1452 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2008)
People ex rel. Carpenter v. Corcoran
46 A.D.3d 1468 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2007)
People ex rel. Elkady v. Conway
41 A.D.3d 1176 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2007)
People ex rel. Bernzott v. Murray
12 A.D.3d 1102 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2004)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
309 A.D.2d 1160, 764 N.Y.S.2d 895, 2003 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10032, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-ex-rel-gloss-v-costello-nyappdiv-2003.