VAN NORSTRAND, GLENN E. v. GRAHAM, HAROLD D.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

VAN NORSTRAND, GLENN E. v. GRAHAM, HAROLD D.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided February 10, 2011·No. KAH 10-00037·Published

Opinion

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department 9 KAH 10-00037 PRESENT: SCUDDER, P.J., PERADOTTO, CARNI, GREEN, AND GORSKI, JJ.

THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK EX REL. GLENN E. VAN NORSTRAND, PETITIONER-APPELLANT,

V ORDER

HAROLD D. GRAHAM, SUPERINTENDENT, AUBURN CORRECTIONAL FACILITY, RESPONDENT-RESPONDENT. (APPEAL NO. 2.)

D.J. & J.A. CIRANDO, ESQS., SYRACUSE (BRADLEY E. KEEM OF COUNSEL), FOR PETITIONER-APPELLANT.

ANDREW M. CUOMO, ATTORNEY GENERAL, ALBANY (KATE H. NEPVEU OF COUNSEL), FOR RESPONDENT-RESPONDENT.

Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Cayuga County (Mark H.

Fandrich, A.J.), entered October 19, 2009 in a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 70. The order denied the motion of petitioner for a stay and reconsideration.

It is hereby ORDERED that said appeal is unanimously dismissed without costs (see People ex rel. Hinton v Graham, 66 AD3d 1402, 1403, lv denied 13 NY3d 934, 14 NY3d 795).

Entered: February 10, 2011 Patricia L. Morgan Clerk of the Court

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department 9 KAH 10-00037 PRESENT: SCUDDER, P.J., PERADOTTO, CARNI, GREEN, AND GORSKI, JJ.

THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK EX REL. GLENN E. VAN NORSTRAND, PETITIONER-APPELLANT,

V ORDER

HAROLD D. GRAHAM, SUPERINTENDENT, AUBURN CORRECTIONAL FACILITY, RESPONDENT-RESPONDENT. (APPEAL NO. 2.)

D.J. & J.A. CIRANDO, ESQS., SYRACUSE (BRADLEY E. KEEM OF COUNSEL), FOR PETITIONER-APPELLANT.

ANDREW M. CUOMO, ATTORNEY GENERAL, ALBANY (KATE H. NEPVEU OF COUNSEL), FOR RESPONDENT-RESPONDENT.

Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Cayuga County (Mark H.

Fandrich, A.J.), entered October 19, 2009 in a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 70. The order denied the motion of petitioner for a stay and reconsideration.

It is hereby ORDERED that said appeal is unanimously dismissed without costs (see People ex rel. Hinton v Graham, 66 AD3d 1402, 1403, lv denied 13 NY3d 934, 14 NY3d 795).

Entered: February 10, 2011 Patricia L. Morgan Clerk of the Court

VAN NORSTRAND, GLENN E. v. GRAHAM, HAROLD D., (N.Y. Ct. App. 2011).

Pincite

VAN NORSTRAND, GLENN E. v. GRAHAM, HAROLD D. (VAN NORSTRAND, GLENN E. v. GRAHAM, HAROLD D.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related