People ex rel. Prince v. Meloni

166 A.D.2d 926
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided October 5, 1990·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: Supreme Court properly dismissed the habeas corpus petition. The State Board of Parole is clearly autho[927] rized to impose special conditions upon a conditional releasee (see, Penal Law § 70.40 [1] [b]; Executive Law § 259-c [2]; § 259-g [1], [2]), and the authority to impose special conditions may be lawfully delegated to a parole officer (see, 9 NYCRR 8003.1 [b]; 8003.2 [l]; 8003.3; People ex rel. Frisbie v Hammock, 112 AD2d 721). Furthermore, the special conditions of release did not have to be filed with the Secretary of State (see, Matter of Williams v Smith, 72 NY2d 939). (Appeal from judgment of Supreme Court, Monroe County, Boehm, J.—habeas corpus.) Present—Dillon, P. J., Callahan, Green, Balio and Davis, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People ex rel. Prince v. Meloni, 166 A.D.2d 926 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1990).

166 A.D.2d 926 (People ex rel. Prince v. Meloni) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People ex rel. Beam v. Hodges
286 A.D.2d 936 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2001)
Gerena v. Rodriguez
192 A.D.2d 606 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1993)