People ex rel. Prince v. Meloni

166 A.D.2d 926
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedOctober 5, 1990
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 166 A.D.2d 926 (People ex rel. Prince v. Meloni) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People ex rel. Prince v. Meloni, 166 A.D.2d 926 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1990).

Opinion

Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: Supreme Court properly dismissed the habeas corpus petition. The State Board of Parole is clearly autho[927]*927rized to impose special conditions upon a conditional releasee (see, Penal Law § 70.40 [1] [b]; Executive Law § 259-c [2]; § 259-g [1], [2]), and the authority to impose special conditions may be lawfully delegated to a parole officer (see, 9 NYCRR 8003.1 [b]; 8003.2 [l]; 8003.3; People ex rel. Frisbie v Hammock, 112 AD2d 721). Furthermore, the special conditions of release did not have to be filed with the Secretary of State (see, Matter of Williams v Smith, 72 NY2d 939). (Appeal from judgment of Supreme Court, Monroe County, Boehm, J.—habeas corpus.) Present—Dillon, P. J., Callahan, Green, Balio and Davis, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

People ex rel. Beam v. Hodges
286 A.D.2d 936 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2001)
Gerena v. Rodriguez
192 A.D.2d 606 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1993)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
166 A.D.2d 926, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-ex-rel-prince-v-meloni-nyappdiv-1990.