Pennsylvania Gaming Control Board v. Office of the Attorney General of the Commonwealth

44 A.3d 1134, 615 Pa. 590, 2011 WL 7832569, 2011 Pa. LEXIS 2752
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided November 14, 2011·No. 83 WM 2010·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinions

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 14th day of November, 2011, it is hereby ordered that the Petition for Review is denied.

The Application to File Under Seal is granted. The Motion to Strike Pennsylvania Gaming Control Board’s Reply Brief or in the Alternative Permit OAG to File Sur-Reply Brief is denied.

Chief Justice CASTILLE files a Dissenting Statement. Justice EAKIN Files a Dissenting Statement which is joined by Justice McCAFFERY.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Pennsylvania Gaming Control Board v. Office of the Attorney General of the Commonwealth, 44 A.3d 1134, 615 Pa. 590, 2011 WL 7832569, 2011 Pa. LEXIS 2752 (Pa. 2011).

44 A.3d 1134 (Pennsylvania Gaming Control Board v. Office of the Attorney General of the Commonwealth) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Erie Insurance Exchange v. Moore
175 A.3d 999 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 2017)
In re Thirty-third Statewide Investigating Grand Jury
86 A.3d 204 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 2014)