Penn v. Edwards

Supreme Court of Alabama

Penn v. Edwards

42 Ala. 655

Supreme Court of Alabama·Decided June 15, 1868·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

BYRD, J.

I. The action of the court in overruling a motion to quash the attachment, is not reviewable on appeal.— Reynolds v. Bell, 3 Ala. 57; Masey v. Walker, 8 Ala. 167 ; 12 ib. 472; Gill v. Downs, 26 ib. 670. The act ap[656]*656proved February 23d, 1866, (Pamphlet Acts, 94,) does not aid the appellant.

II. The Code requires the plaintiff in attachment to file a complaint, (§ 2998,) and it is error for the court to render judgment by default without a complaint. — Amason v. Nash, 19 Ala. 104.

Eeversed and remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

BYRD, J.

I. The action of the court in overruling a motion to quash the attachment, is not reviewable on appeal.— Reynolds v. Bell, 3 Ala. 57; Masey v. Walker, 8 Ala. 167 ; 12 ib. 472; Gill v. Downs, 26 ib. 670. The act ap[656]*656proved February 23d, 1866, (Pamphlet Acts, 94,) does not aid the appellant.

II. The Code requires the plaintiff in attachment to file a complaint, (§ 2998,) and it is error for the court to render judgment by default without a complaint. — Amason v. Nash, 19 Ala. 104.

Eeversed and remanded.

Penn v. Edwards, 42 Ala. 655 (Ala. 1868).

Pincite

42 Ala. 655 (Penn v. Edwards) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related