Haygood v. Tait

126 Ala. 264
Supreme Court of Alabama·Decided November 15, 1899·Published·Cited by 10 cases

Opinion

McCLELLAN, C. J.

No appeal lies to this court from an order of the circuit court denying and overruling a motion to set aside a- judgment by default and to .grant a new trial, and error cannot be assigned upon such action.—Truss v. B. L. & M. R. R. Co., 96 Ala. 316; Ledbetter & Co. et al., v. Vinton, 108 Ala. 644. Assignments of error numbered from 1 to 5 inclusive, will, therefore, be disregarded.

The court, however, committeed reversible error in Tendering judgment by default against the defendant before any complaint bad been filed in the cause by the plaintiff.—Code, §§ 561, 572; Steelman v. Owen, 8 Port. 562; Amason v. Nash, 19 Ala. 104; Arundale v. Moore, 42 Ala. 482; Jones v. Howard, 42 Ala. 483; Penn v. Edwards, 42 Ala. 655; Heyman v. McBurney, 66 Ala. 511; Elmore v. Simon, 67 Ala. 526; and for ibis the judgment must be reversed. The cause is remanded.

Reversed and remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Haygood v. Tait, 126 Ala. 264 (Ala. 1899).

126 Ala. 264 (Haygood v. Tait) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Ex Parte State Ex Rel. Atlas Auto Finance Co.
38 So. 2d 560 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1948)
Ingalls Shipbuilding Corporation v. Cahela
36 So. 2d 513 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1948)
Carmichael v. J. C. Jones & Bro.
76 So. 478 (Alabama Court of Appeals, 1917)
Hershey Chocolate Co. v. Yates
72 So. 260 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1916)
Hendley v. Chabert
65 So. 993 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1914)
Choctawhatchie H'dwood L. Co. v. Adams
65 So. 678 (Alabama Court of Appeals, 1914)
Marx v. Barbour Plumbing & Elec. Co.
64 So. 645 (Alabama Court of Appeals, 1914)
Ex parte Parker
54 So. 572 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1911)
Baggett v. Alabama Chemical Co.
47 So. 102 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1908)
Buford v. Christian
42 So. 997 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1907)