Choctawhatchie H'dwood L. Co. v. Adams
65 So. 678, 10 Ala. App. 613, 1914 Ala. App. LEXIS 248
Opinion
The default judgment rendered against the appellant as defendant in the attachment proceedings was unauthorized, in that the statute in [614]*614such cases made and provided requires the plaintiff to file a complaint. — Code 1907, § 2961. The judgment is shown to have been rendered without a complaint having been filed. This constitutes reversible error. — Penn v. Edwards, 42 Ala. 655. See, also, Haygood v. Tait, 126 Ala. 264, 27 South. 842, and authorities there cited.
Reversed and remanded.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Choctawhatchie H'dwood L. Co. v. Adams, 65 So. 678, 10 Ala. App. 613, 1914 Ala. App. LEXIS 248 (Ala. Ct. App. 1914).
65 So. 678 (Choctawhatchie H'dwood L. Co. v. Adams) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Penn v. Edwards
42 Ala. 655 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1868)
Haygood v. Tait
126 Ala. 264 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1899)