Amason v. Nash

19 Ala. 104
Supreme Court of Alabama·Decided January 15, 1851·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

DARGAN, C. J.

The authorities cited on the brief of the plaintiff’s counsel conclusively show that a judgment by default without a declaration is erroneous. We have in our practice, it is true, greatly relaxed the stringent rules of the common law; but we never have sustained a judgment by default, when there was no declaration. The record before us shows that at the time the judgment was rendered, no declaration had been filed, nor was it filed until after the adjournment of the court. The rendition of judgment without a declaration was an error which the plaintiff could not cure by filing a declaration after the court adjourned. — See McElroy v. Dwight, 1 Stewart, 149; Rankin v. Crowill, Minor’s R. 125.

Let the judgment be reversed, and the cause remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Amason v. Nash, 19 Ala. 104 (Ala. 1851).

19 Ala. 104 (Amason v. Nash) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Haygood v. Tait
126 Ala. 264 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1899)
Penn v. Edwards
42 Ala. 655 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1868)
Jones v. Howard
42 Ala. 483 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1868)