Peach v. Commissioner

84 T.C. No. 72, 84 T.C. 1312, 1985 U.S. Tax Ct. LEXIS 66
CourtUnited States Tax Court
DecidedJune 20, 1985
DocketDocket No. 19718-84
StatusPublished
Cited by23 cases

This text of 84 T.C. No. 72 (Peach v. Commissioner) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Tax Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Peach v. Commissioner, 84 T.C. No. 72, 84 T.C. 1312, 1985 U.S. Tax Ct. LEXIS 66 (tax 1985).

Opinion

OPINION

Scott, Judge-.

This case is before us on respondent’s motion for summary judgment. The issue raised by respondent’s motion is whether petitioners are entitled to an energy tax credit with respect to a water-source heat pump installed in 1980.

At the hearing on respondent’s motion, the parties agreed to all the facts necessary to a decision of the issue presented here. Since there is no issue of material fact in this case, its disposition on the basis of respondent’s motion for summary judgment is appropriate. Rule 121(b), Tax Court Rules of Practice and Procedure; Espinoza v. Commissioner, 78 T.C. 412 (1982).

Respondent determined a deficiency in petitioners’ income tax for the calendar year 1980 in the amount of $1,672.

The agreed facts in this case show that petitioners resided in Great Falls, South Carolina, at the time of the filing of their petition in this case. They filed a joint Federal income tax return for the calendar year 1980 with the Internal Revenue Service Center, Atlanta, Georgia.

In the spring of 1980, Mr. Peach (petitioner) began consideration of installing a water-source heat pump (sometimes referred to as a ground water heat pump) to produce a source of energy to heat and cool petitioners’ residence. On August 21, 1980, petitioner placed a firm order for the heat pump and the materials necessary for its installation. Later that year, the heat pump was installed. This heat pump is one which pumps water from a well. The year-round temperature of the water used in the system installed by petitioners is 15.56 degrees to 18.33 degrees Celsius (60 degrees to 65 degrees Fahrenheit). At the time petitioners purchased the heat pump for heating and cooling purposes in their home, the suppliers of such heat pumps were advertising that a person would be entitled to an energy tax credit with respect to the heat pump if it was used with a geothermal well water system. Petitioner asked someone at the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) whether the equipment he was considering purchasing, which he described to the individual with whom he spoke, would qualify for the energy tax credit. The individual at the IRS with whom petitioner spoke told him that no standards for equipment to be used with a geothermal well water system had been published and therefore the equipment he was considering purchasing should qualify. However, this individual suggested that petitioner read "Your Federal Income Tax,” Publication 17. Petitioner obtained this publication, which referred the reader to IRS Publication 903 for a full explanation of the energy tax credit. Petitioner obtained the November 1979 revision of Publication 903. This publication contained the following statement which petitioner interpreted to entitle him to the energy tax credit with respect to the equipment he was contemplating buying:

The renewable energy source property, to qualify, must be new, must be expected to last at least 5 years, and must meet certain performance and quality standards to be set by the Secretary of the Treasury. As of the date of this publication, no performance and quality standards have been issued. However, the property does not have to meet the standards if you buy it before the standards are published. The cost of renewable energy source equipment includes labor cost properly allocable to the on-site preparation, assembly, or installation of the equipment.
* * >}; * * * *
Geothermal energy property is equipment that uses geothermal energy to heat or cool the home or to provide hot water for use within the home. This is done by distributing or using geothermal deposits. A geothermal deposit is a geothermal reservoir containing natural heat stored in rocks, water, or vapor. For example, hot springs are a geothermal deposit.

Petitioners, on their income tax return for the calendar year 1980, claimed a residential energy credit of $1,672. On the Form 5695, "Energy Credits,” attached to their return, petitioners showed an amount of $6,368.21 as expended for "Renewable Energy Source items: b. Geothermal” with a resulting energy credit of $2,547.28. The claimed credit was limited to $1,672 since the amount of petitioners’ income tax for 1980 shown on their return prior to reduction by the claimed energy tax credit was $1,672. At the bottom of the Form 5695 attached to petitioners’ return, the statement "credit carryover 875.28” appears.

Respondent, in his notice of deficiency, disallowed the energy tax credit claimed by petitioners.

Section 44C (now section 23) of the Code1 provides for a credit to be allowed to individuals for qualified expenditures after April 20, 1977, and prior to December 31, 1985, for property which, when installed in connection with a dwelling, transmits or uses geothermal deposits as defined in section 613(e)(3) for the purpose of heating or cooling such dwelling or providing hot water or electricity for use with such dwelling.2 The statute specifically provides that the Secretary shall by regulation establish the criteria which are to be used in prescribing performance and quality standards for renewable energy source property and to establish a procedure under which a manufacturer of an item may request the Secretary to certify that the item would be treated as renewable energy source property.

On May 23, 1979, proposed regulations with respect to renewable energy source property and the energy tax credit were published in the Federal Register (44 Fed. Reg. 29924 (1979)). Section 1.44C-2(e) of this proposed regulation described renewable energy source property insofar as here pertinent as follows:

(e) Renewable energy source property — (1) In general. The term "renewable energy source property” includes any solar energy property, wind energy property, geothermal energy property, or property referred to in subparagraph (2), which meets the following conditions:
(i) The original use of the property begins with the taxpayer.
(ii) The property can reasonably be expected to remain in operation for at least 5 years.
(iii) The property meets the applicable performance and quality standards prescribed in sec. 1.44C-4 (if any) that are in effect at the time of the taxpayer’s acquisition of the property.

Section 1.44C-2(h) of these proposed regulations defined geothermal energy property. This section, which included a definition of a geothermal deposit, provided as follows:

(h) Geothermal energy property. The term "geothermal energy property” includes equipment (and parts solely related to the functioning of such equipment) necessary to transmit or use energy from a geothermal deposit to heat or cool a dwelling or provide hot water for use within the dwelling. Equipment such as a pipe that serves both a geothermal function (by transmitting hot geothermal water within a dwelling) and a non-geothermal function (by transmitting hot water from a water heater within a dwelling) does not qualify as geothermal property.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Thorne v. Commissioner
99 T.C. No. 4 (U.S. Tax Court, 1992)
Newborn v. Commissioner
94 T.C. No. 36 (U.S. Tax Court, 1990)
Pagel, Inc. v. Commissioner
91 T.C. No. 18 (U.S. Tax Court, 1988)
Cox v. Commissioner
1987 T.C. Memo. 455 (U.S. Tax Court, 1987)
Crawford v. Commissioner
1987 T.C. Memo. 255 (U.S. Tax Court, 1987)
Gurta v. Commissioner
1987 T.C. Memo. 194 (U.S. Tax Court, 1987)
Wagner v. Commissioner
1987 T.C. Memo. 179 (U.S. Tax Court, 1987)
Hopp v. United States
661 F. Supp. 800 (S.D. Iowa, 1987)
Sundermeier v. Commissioner
1987 T.C. Memo. 50 (U.S. Tax Court, 1987)
Caldwell v. Commissioner
1986 T.C. Memo. 301 (U.S. Tax Court, 1986)
Laxson v. Commissioner
1986 T.C. Memo. 291 (U.S. Tax Court, 1986)
Wehr v. Commissioner
1986 T.C. Memo. 284 (U.S. Tax Court, 1986)
Burk v. Commissioner
1986 T.C. Memo. 233 (U.S. Tax Court, 1986)
Herbert v. Commissioner
1986 T.C. Memo. 186 (U.S. Tax Court, 1986)
Bayless v. Commissioner
1986 T.C. Memo. 113 (U.S. Tax Court, 1986)
Chiple v. Commissioner
1986 T.C. Memo. 114 (U.S. Tax Court, 1986)
Zaccaro v. Commissioner
1986 T.C. Memo. 82 (U.S. Tax Court, 1986)
Sell v. Commissioner
1985 T.C. Memo. 556 (U.S. Tax Court, 1985)
Peach v. Commissioner
84 T.C. No. 72 (U.S. Tax Court, 1985)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
84 T.C. No. 72, 84 T.C. 1312, 1985 U.S. Tax Ct. LEXIS 66, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/peach-v-commissioner-tax-1985.