Caldwell v. Commissioner

1986 T.C. Memo. 301, 51 T.C.M. 1470, 1986 Tax Ct. Memo LEXIS 306
CourtUnited States Tax Court
DecidedJuly 22, 1986
DocketDocket No. 41311-84.
StatusUnpublished

This text of 1986 T.C. Memo. 301 (Caldwell v. Commissioner) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Tax Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Caldwell v. Commissioner, 1986 T.C. Memo. 301, 51 T.C.M. 1470, 1986 Tax Ct. Memo LEXIS 306 (tax 1986).

Opinion

KENNETH C. CALDWELL AND BRENDA S. CALDWELL, Petitioners v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent
Caldwell v. Commissioner
Docket No. 41311-84.
United States Tax Court
T.C. Memo 1986-301; 1986 Tax Ct. Memo LEXIS 306; 51 T.C.M. (CCH) 1470; T.C.M. (RIA) 86301;
July 22, 1986.
Kenneth C. Caldwell, pro se.
Terry L. Zabel, for the respondent.

HAMBLEN

MEMORANDUM OPINION

HAMBLEN, Judge: This case is before the Court on respondent's motion for*307 summary judgment pursuant to Rule 121. 1

The parties have submitted a stipulation of facts. The stipulation of facts and attached exhibits are incorporated herein by this reference.

Petitioners resided in Dayton, Ohio, at the time they filed their petition in this case.

Respondent determined a deficiency in petitioners' 1982 Federal income tax in the amount of $3,368.40. In the notice of deficiency issued to petitioners on September 28, 1984, respondent determined that the amount of $8,421.00 which petitioners reported as geothermal renewable energy source costs does not qualify for the residential energy credit under section 44C(a)(2). 2 Respondent asserts that petitioners' allowable energy credit for 1982 is $580.00 for solar renewable energy source costs in the amount of $1,450.00 rather than a credit of $3,948.40 for expenditures of $9,871.00 claimed by petitioners on their 1982 joint Federal tax return. These expenditures were made in 1982. *308 3

Respondent's motion for summary judgment was filed on February 3, 1986. In his motion, respondent claims that there is no genuine issue as to any material fact and that respondent is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. Respondent asserts that petitioners' equipment does not qualify as renewable energy source property since the equipment does not utilize or transmit energy derived from a geothermal deposit. Respondent argues that the temperature of the geothermal deposit is substantially lower than the 50 degrees Celsius limitation required for geothermal deposits and described in section 1.44C-2(h), Income Tax Regs. Petitioners*309 concede that the water used or transmitted by their equipment has a temperature at the wellhead of approximately 13 degrees Celsius, but claim that the temperature limitation in section 1.44C-2(h), Income Tax Regs., is arbitrary and not in conformance with the intent of section 44C. In their response to respondent's motion for summary judgment, petitioners argue that respondent has ignored the Senate Finance Committee's definitions of geothermal equipment and geothermal deposit and, as a result, has erroneously set the temperature limitation for a geothermal deposit at 50 degrees Celsius in section 1.44C-2(h), Income Tax Regs., and disallowed the credit for costs associated with heat pumps.

A decision will be rendered on a motion for summary judgment if the pleadings, answers to interrogatories, depositions, admissions, and any other acceptable materials, together with the affidavits, if any, show that there is no genuine issue as to any material fact and that a decision may be rendered as a matter of law. Rule 121(b). Here, both parties concede that there is no genuine issue of material fact, and consequently our determination is limited to the application of the law to the facts*310 presented.

Section 44C(a)(2) generally provides that an individual taxpayer shall be allowed a credit for qualified renewable energy source expenditures. A renewable energy source expenditure must be made with respect to renewable energy source property. Sec. 44C(c)(2)(A). Renewable energy source property specifically includes certain property which transmits or uses energy derived from geothermal deposits. Sec. 44C(c)(5). 4

Section 44C(6)(A)(i) specifically authorizes the Secretary to issue regulations which establish criteria to be used in prescribing performance and quality standards for renewable energy source property. The Secretary has issued regulations for geothermal energy property which provide, in pertinent part:

(h) Geothermal energy property. The term "geothermal*311 energy property" includes equipment (and parts solely related to the functioning of such equipment) necessary to transmit or use energy from a geothermal deposit to heat or cool a dwelling or provide hot water for use within the dwelling. Equipment such as a pipe that serves both a geothermal function (by transmitting hot geothermal water within a dwelling) and a non-geothermal function (by transmitting hot water from a water heater within a dwelling) does not qualify as geothermal property. A geothermal deposit is a geothermal reservoir consisting of natural heat which is from an underground source and is stored in rocks or in an aqueous liquid or vapor (whether or not under pressure), having a temperature exceeding 50 degrees Celsius as measured at the wellhead or, in the case of a natural hot spring (where no well is drilled), at the intake to the distribution system. [Sec. 1.44C-2(h), Income Tax Regs., Emphasis added.] 5

The Supplementary Information relating to the regulations explains that the 50 degree Celsius temperature limitation was included in the final regulations for the following reasons:

Several comments suggested that the definition of geothermal deposit*312

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Commissioner v. South Texas Lumber Co.
333 U.S. 496 (Supreme Court, 1948)
Donigan v. Commissioner
68 T.C. 632 (U.S. Tax Court, 1977)
Wing v. Commissioner
81 T.C. No. 3 (U.S. Tax Court, 1983)
Olson v. Commissioner
81 T.C. No. 24 (U.S. Tax Court, 1983)
Peach v. Commissioner
84 T.C. No. 72 (U.S. Tax Court, 1985)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
1986 T.C. Memo. 301, 51 T.C.M. 1470, 1986 Tax Ct. Memo LEXIS 306, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/caldwell-v-commissioner-tax-1986.