Herbert v. Commissioner
This text of 1986 T.C. Memo. 186 (Herbert v. Commissioner) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Tax Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
MEMORANDUM OPINION
GUSSIS,
Respondent determined a deficiency in petitioners' Federal income tax for the year 1980 in the amount of $1,149.85. The sole issue for determination is whether petitioners are entitled to a residential energy credit for $1,149.85 under section 44C(a)(2). 2
Some of the facts have been stipulated and are found accordingly. Petitioners resided in Knoxville, Tennessee at the time they filed their petition.
During 1980, petitioners installed a self-designed hearing and cooling system in their residence. The system utilized water from the nearby Melton Hill Reservoir at temperatures between 43 degrees Fahrenheit (approximately 6 degrees Celsius) and 73 degrees Fahrenheit (approximately 23 degrees Celsius) for heating and cooling the petitioners' home. On their joint 1980 Federal income tax*423 return, petitioners claimed an energy credit in the amount of $1,149.85. Respondent, in his notice of deficiency, disallowed the claimed credit on the ground that the ground water heat pump (system) did not meet the requisite definition of "renewable energy source property" pursuant to section 44C.
Section 44C allows a credit to individual taxpayers for qualified energy source expenditures made with respect to renewable energy source property. Section 44C(a)(2). Renewable energy source property includes property which transmits or uses energy derived from geothermal deposits. Section 44C(c)(5)(A)(i). Under section 44C(c)(6)(A)(i), the Secretary is empowered to issue regulations which establish criteria to be used in prescribing performance and quality standards for renewable energy source property. Pursuant to this authority, regulations were promulgated (
equipment * * * necessary to transmit or use energy from a geothermal deposit to heat or cool a dwelling * * *. A geothermal deposit is a geothermal reservoir consisting of natural heat which is from an
The parties have stipulated that the petitioners' heating and cooling equipment utilized ground water at temperatures between 6 degrees Celsius and 23 degrees Celsius for heating and cooling the petitioners' home. It is evident therefore that the system does not qualify as geothermal property under the regulations. The fact that the system may be energy efficient is, by itself, irrelevant to a determination of whether such property qualifies for the residential energy credit under section 44C(a)(2). See
Petitioner argues that the regulations do not reflect the intention of Congress. However, similar arguments have been previously considered and rejected by this Court.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
1986 T.C. Memo. 186, 51 T.C.M. 983, 1986 Tax Ct. Memo LEXIS 421, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/herbert-v-commissioner-tax-1986.