(PC) Caruso v. Johnson

E.D. California

(PC) Caruso v. Johnson

DecidedMarch 2, 2020

Docket1:15-cv-00780

StatusUnknown

This text of (PC) Caruso v. Johnson ((PC) Caruso v. Johnson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, E.D. California primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

(PC) Caruso v. Johnson, (E.D. Cal. 2020).

Pincite

Opinion

1 2 3 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 4 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 5 6 | GINA CARUSO, CASE NO. 1:15-CV-0780 AWI EPG 7 Plaintiff ORDER ON PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO 8 v. FILE SUPPLEMENTAL BRIEFING 9 | OFFICER G. SOLORIO, et al., (Doc. No. 226) 10 Defendants 11 12 13 Currently pending before the Court is inter alia a motion for summary judgment by 14 Defendants. That motion was taken under submission in December 2019. On February 28, 2020, 15 | Plaintiff filed a motion to submit supplemental briefing. Plaintiff contends that Bearchild v. 16 | Cobban, 947 F.3d 1130 (9th Cir. 2020), which was issued in January 2020, is directly relevant to 17 | Defendants’ motion and that additional briefing regarding Bearchild would be beneficial. After 18 consideration, the Court will permit the parties, if they wish, to file supplemental briefing on the 19 |impact of Bearchild on Defendants’ pending motion for summary judgment. 20 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that, within seven (7) days of service of this 21 order, the parties may simultaneously submit supplemental briefing regarding the impact of 22 | Bearchild vy. Cobban, 947 F.3d 1130 (9th Cir. 2020) on Defendants’ motion for summary 23 | judgment. 24 25 IT IS SO ORDERED. 96 | Dated: _March 2, 2020 —. 7 Sz 7 Cb Lec — SENIOR DISTRICT JUDGE 27 28

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

1 2 3 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 4 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 5 6 | GINA CARUSO, CASE NO. 1:15-CV-0780 AWI EPG 7 Plaintiff ORDER ON PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO 8 v. FILE SUPPLEMENTAL BRIEFING 9 | OFFICER G. SOLORIO, et al., (Doc. No. 226) 10 Defendants 11 12 13 Currently pending before the Court is inter alia a motion for summary judgment by 14 Defendants. That motion was taken under submission in December 2019. On February 28, 2020, 15 | Plaintiff filed a motion to submit supplemental briefing. Plaintiff contends that Bearchild v. 16 | Cobban, 947 F.3d 1130 (9th Cir. 2020), which was issued in January 2020, is directly relevant to 17 | Defendants’ motion and that additional briefing regarding Bearchild would be beneficial. After 18 consideration, the Court will permit the parties, if they wish, to file supplemental briefing on the 19 |impact of Bearchild on Defendants’ pending motion for summary judgment. 20 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that, within seven (7) days of service of this 21 order, the parties may simultaneously submit supplemental briefing regarding the impact of 22 | Bearchild vy. Cobban, 947 F.3d 1130 (9th Cir. 2020) on Defendants’ motion for summary 23 | judgment. 24 25 IT IS SO ORDERED. 96 | Dated: _March 2, 2020 —. 7 Sz 7 Cb Lec — SENIOR DISTRICT JUDGE 27 28

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

(PC) Caruso v. Johnson, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pc-caruso-v-johnson-caed-2020.