Parr v. Stockwell

322 S.W.2d 615, 159 Tex. 440, 2 Tex. Sup. Ct. J. 262, 1959 Tex. LEXIS 566
CourtTexas Supreme Court
DecidedApril 8, 1959
DocketA-7155
StatusPublished
Cited by31 cases

This text of 322 S.W.2d 615 (Parr v. Stockwell) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Texas Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Parr v. Stockwell, 322 S.W.2d 615, 159 Tex. 440, 2 Tex. Sup. Ct. J. 262, 1959 Tex. LEXIS 566 (Tex. 1959).

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

The Court of Civil Appeals granted an injunction restraining George B. Parr and Amando Garcia, Jr., and each of them, from attempting in any manner to take over the offices of Sheriff and County Clerk of Duval County until after December 31, 1958, and from in any manner interfering with the occupancy and management of said offices by appellants, J. P. Stockwell and Rafael Garcia, until after said date, and enjoining appellees Daniel Tobin, Jr., Tomas H. Molina and Juan Leal, from in any manner attempting to seat George B. Parr and Amando Garcia, Jr., or either of them in the offices of Sheriff and County Clerk of Duval County, until after December 31, 1958. 319 S.W. 2d 779. George B. Parr, Amando Garcia, Jr., Daniel Tobin, Jr., Tomas H. Molina and Juan Leal applied for writ of error.

From the record it appears that the motion for rehearing was overruled on December 31, 1958, and the injunction expired *441 by its own terms on that date. It is therefore apparent from the face of the record that the question of whether or not the injunction should have been granted is moot. Accordingly, writ of error is granted without reference to the merits of the matters or issues decided by the Court of Civil Appeals, University Interscholastic League v. Sims, 133 Texas 605, 131 S.W. 2d 94, and this cause in so far as it relates to such temporary injunction is dismissed at the cost of the petitioners.

This order of dismissal is entered without prejudice to such further actions as the parties may wish to take with reference to the consolidated case on the merits. As the judgment of the Court of Civil Appeals has been vacated, its opinion will not necessarily control the trial of the cause on the merits. Rogelio Guajardo, Sr. Trustee, et al. v. Alamo Lumber Company, 159 Texas 225, 317 S.W. 2d 725.

Opinion delivered April 8, 1959.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

McGill Financial Ltd. v. Kristin McGill
Court of Appeals of Texas, 2025
WCJ Assets, Ltd. v. US Trinity Bridgeport, LLC
Court of Appeals of Texas, 2023
Gregory S. Strange v. HRSMART, Inc
400 S.W.3d 125 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 2013)
Cascos v. Cameron County Attorney
319 S.W.3d 205 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 2010)
in Re: Cameron County Judge Carlos Cascos
Court of Appeals of Texas, 2010
Faddoul, Glasheen & Valles, P.C. v. Oaxaca
52 S.W.3d 209 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 2001)
National Collegiate Athletic Ass'n v. Jones
1 S.W.3d 83 (Texas Supreme Court, 1999)
National Collegiate Athletic Ass'n v. Jones
982 S.W.2d 450 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1998)
University Interscholastic League v. Buchanan
848 S.W.2d 298 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1993)
Texas Education Agency v. Dallas Independent School District
797 S.W.2d 367 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1990)
Juliette Fowler Homes, Inc. v. Welch Associates, Inc.
793 S.W.2d 660 (Texas Supreme Court, 1990)
Barnett v. Conroe Independent School District
455 S.W.2d 376 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1970)
State Ex Rel. Dishman v. Gary
359 S.W.2d 456 (Texas Supreme Court, 1962)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
322 S.W.2d 615, 159 Tex. 440, 2 Tex. Sup. Ct. J. 262, 1959 Tex. LEXIS 566, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/parr-v-stockwell-tex-1959.