Owens v. Outlaw
This text of 30 S.E. 427 (Owens v. Outlaw) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
A possessory warrant does not lie unless the defendant acquired possession of the property in dispute in one of the modes set forth in section 4799 of the Civil Code. Consequently, when upon the trial of such a warrant, it affirmatively appeared that the defendant had, without fraud, obtained possession by virtue of a contract with the plaintiff, and the only question in issue was whether or not, under the terms of such contract, it was the defendant’s right to longer retain possession, it was erroneous to render a judgment in the plaintiff’s favor. His remedy, in such a case, was an action of trover, with a requirement of hail, if necessary. Trotti v. Wyly & Greene, 77 Ga. 684.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
30 S.E. 427, 105 Ga. 477, 1898 Ga. LEXIS 570, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/owens-v-outlaw-ga-1898.