Susong v. McKenna

48 S.E. 695, 121 Ga. 97, 1904 Ga. LEXIS 28
Supreme Court of Georgia·Decided October 17, 1904·Published·Cited by 8 cases

Opinion

Cobb, J.

1. A possessory warrant does not lie unless the defendant acquired possession of the property in dispute in one of the modes set forth in the Civil Code, §4799. Owens v. Outlaw, 105 Ga. 477.

2. Under the provisions of the Civil Code, §4807, .the judge of the superior court, in passing upon a certiorari from the decision of a justice of the peace in a possessory-warrant case, may, in his discretion, make a final disposition of the case, without sending it back for a new trial, even though the evidence before the justice of the peace was conflicting on controlling issues. Sheriff v. Thompson, 116 Ga. 436 (2), and cit.

•3. Applying the principles above laid down to the facts of the present oase, no sufficient reason has been shown for reversing the judgment.

Judgment affirmed.

AU the Justices concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Susong v. McKenna, 48 S.E. 695, 121 Ga. 97, 1904 Ga. LEXIS 28 (Ga. 1904).

48 S.E. 695 (Susong v. McKenna) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Davis v. Logan
57 S.E.2d 568 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1950)
Burch v. Holliday
172 S.E. 581 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1934)
Elrod v. Edwards
153 S.E. 785 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1930)
Whitworth v. Carter
147 S.E. 904 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1929)
Hogan v. O'Dell
146 S.E. 43 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1928)
Cone v. Bodiford
121 S.E. 523 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1924)
Butler v. Lazenby
68 S.E. 521 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1910)
Brown v. Todd
53 S.E. 678 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1906)