Susong v. McKenna
This text of 48 S.E. 695 (Susong v. McKenna) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
1. A possessory warrant does not lie unless the defendant acquired possession of the property in dispute in one of the modes set forth in the Civil Code, §4799. Owens v. Outlaw, 105 Ga. 477.
2. Under the provisions of the Civil Code, §4807, .the judge of the superior court, in passing upon a certiorari from the decision of a justice of the peace in a possessory-warrant case, may, in his discretion, make a final disposition of the case, without sending it back for a new trial, even though the evidence before the justice of the peace was conflicting on controlling issues. Sheriff v. Thompson, 116 Ga. 436 (2), and cit.
•3. Applying the principles above laid down to the facts of the present oase, no sufficient reason has been shown for reversing the judgment.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
48 S.E. 695, 121 Ga. 97, 1904 Ga. LEXIS 28, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/susong-v-mckenna-ga-1904.