Headrick Bros. v. Wheat
This text of 174 S.E. 545 (Headrick Bros. v. Wheat) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinions
1. From the facts of the case, including the note of the judge, it does not appear that he erred in overruling the exceptions to the answer of the trial magistrate.
2. In view of the facts set forth in the answer of the trial magistrate, the judge of the superior court did not err in overruling the certiorari. As to the several contentions of the plaintiff in error, see Elrod v. Edwards, 41 Ga. App. 490 (153 S. E. 785); Tison v. Ferguson, 17 Ga. App. 659 (87 S. E. 1089); Meredith v. Knott, 34 Ga. 222; West v. Williams, 84 Ga. 665 (11 8. E. 505); Hillyer v. Brogden, 67 Ga. 24; Davis v. Rhodes, 112 Ga. 106 (5) (37 S. E. 169).
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
174 S.E. 545, 49 Ga. App. 149, 1934 Ga. App. LEXIS 310, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/headrick-bros-v-wheat-gactapp-1934.