Pearson v. Abell

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Pearson v. Abell

85 S.E. 935, 16 Ga. App. 634, 1915 Ga. App. LEXIS 167

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia

DecidedJuly 30, 1915

Docket6215

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 85 S.E. 935 (Pearson v. Abell) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Pearson v. Abell, 85 S.E. 935, 16 Ga. App. 634, 1915 Ga. App. LEXIS 167 (Ga. Ct. App. 1915).

Pincite

Opinion

Broyles, J.

1. While the general relation between the parties may have been that of landlord and cropper (although this does not clearly appear in the record), yet so far as the particular property which was the subject-matter of this action was concerned no such relationship existed between them, but they were in fact partners.

(a) This being true, and the undisputed evidence showing that the tenant acquired possession of the property in dispute without fraud, and by virtue of a contract with the landlord, the possessory warrant taken out by the landlord should, on motion, have been dismissed. Owens v. Outlaw, 105 Ga. 477 (30 S. E. 427).

2. It being shown by the evidence that the tenant was clearly entitled to the possession of the property, the awarding of' the property to the landlord was contrary to law and the evidence, and the judge of the superior court should have sanctioned the certiorari. Judgment reversed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Broyles, J.

1. While the general relation between the parties may have been that of landlord and cropper (although this does not clearly appear in the record), yet so far as the particular property which was the subject-matter of this action was concerned no such relationship existed between them, but they were in fact partners.

(a) This being true, and the undisputed evidence showing that the tenant acquired possession of the property in dispute without fraud, and by virtue of a contract with the landlord, the possessory warrant taken out by the landlord should, on motion, have been dismissed. Owens v. Outlaw, 105 Ga. 477 (30 S. E. 427).

2. It being shown by the evidence that the tenant was clearly entitled to the possession of the property, the awarding of' the property to the landlord was contrary to law and the evidence, and the judge of the superior court should have sanctioned the certiorari. Judgment reversed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

85 S.E. 935, 16 Ga. App. 634, 1915 Ga. App. LEXIS 167, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pearson-v-abell-gactapp-1915.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack