Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. v. Caldwell
This text of 814 S.W.2d 390 (Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. v. Caldwell) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Texas Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In this original mandamus proceeding relator seeks review of sanctions imposed by respondents for abuse of discovery. 807 S.W.2d 413 (Tex.App.1991). We believe that the trial court should have the opportunity to reconsider the rulings of which relator complains in this proceeding in light of our opinion today in Braden v. Downey, 811 S.W.2d 922 (Tex.1991). Accordingly, we vacate our order staying proceedings and deny leave to file this petition for writ of mandamus, without addressing its merits and without prejudice to relator again requesting relief from the court of appeals and this Court after the trial court has had an opportunity to reconsider its rulings.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
814 S.W.2d 390, 34 Tex. Sup. Ct. J. 753, 1991 Tex. LEXIS 95, 1991 WL 106174, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/owens-corning-fiberglas-corp-v-caldwell-tex-1991.