Omega New York Products Corp. v. Parisi Bros.

57 Misc. 2d 1000, 293 N.Y.S.2d 878, 1968 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1270
CourtNew York Supreme Court
DecidedAugust 7, 1968
StatusPublished
Cited by6 cases

This text of 57 Misc. 2d 1000 (Omega New York Products Corp. v. Parisi Bros.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Omega New York Products Corp. v. Parisi Bros., 57 Misc. 2d 1000, 293 N.Y.S.2d 878, 1968 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1270 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1968).

Opinion

Clare J. Hoyt, J.

Plaintiff furnished certain materials to defendant Parisi in connection with a sanitary sewer project that Parisi had undertaken as general contractor in Norwalk, Connecticut. Under the Connecticut statutes Parisi was obliged to furnish performance and payment bonds for the project. Defendant Hartford wrote these bonds. When plaintiff was unable to secure payment it commenced this action. Defendant Hartford moves for dismissal as to it, claiming the New York courts lack jurisdiction of the subject matter of the action.

Plaintiff may recover from Hartford, if at all, only on the payment bond and not on the performance bond (Long v. Ferris, 196 Misc. 567, 568-569). The bond is a statutory bond, so the provisions of the Connecticut statutes are to be read into the instrument in construing it (Graybar Elec. Co. v. New Amsterdam Cas. Co., 292 N. Y. 246). Both by statute (Conn. Gen. Stat., § 49-42, subd. [b]) and by express provision in the bond, suits on the bond must be brought in the county of performance and not elsewhere. In identical circumstances New York courts have treated such a limitation as creating a purely local — not a transitory — cause of action that is enforcible only in the State of performance (Long v. Ferris, supra; Commonwealth of Pa. v. Beals, 139 Misc. 785). Under the circumstances here presented the same result is called for as a matter of comity.

The motion is granted.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

RW Granger & Sons, Inc. v. Rojac Co., Inc.
885 F. Supp. 319 (D. Massachusetts, 1995)
J. R. Cristoni, Inc. v. Reliance Ins., No. Cv94 0358013 (Jul. 25, 1994)
1994 Conn. Super. Ct. 7007 (Connecticut Superior Court, 1994)
Felix Contracting Corp. v. Federal Insurance
97 A.D.2d 533 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1983)
Amoco Oil Co. v. Capitol Indemnity Corp.
291 N.W.2d 883 (Court of Appeals of Wisconsin, 1980)
State ex rel. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. Mehan
581 S.W.2d 837 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1979)
Johnson Acoustics, Inc. v. P. J. Carlin Construction Co.
292 A.2d 273 (Connecticut Superior Court, 1971)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
57 Misc. 2d 1000, 293 N.Y.S.2d 878, 1968 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1270, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/omega-new-york-products-corp-v-parisi-bros-nysupct-1968.