O'Malley v. Continental Life Insurance
This text of 121 S.W.2d 850 (O'Malley v. Continental Life Insurance) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Missouri primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinions
This case, recently reassigned to the writer, is (like O'Malley v. Continental Life Insurance Company, Theodore Rassieur, Intervener,
This case is based on the same record and must be ruled on the same facts as the Rassieur case, since a preferred allowance for attorney fees and expenses in the dissolution suit was claimed on the same theory as in that case. Therefore, our ruling in the Rassieur case is decisive of this case. We hold that Mr. Pace is not entitled to have his claim against the insurance company preferred over those of other creditors.
The judgment is reversed. Ferguson and Bradley, CC., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
121 S.W.2d 850, 343 Mo. 410, 1938 Mo. LEXIS 449, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/omalley-v-continental-life-insurance-mo-1938.