O'Malley v. Continental Life Insurance
Opinions
This case, recently reassigned to the writer, is (like O'Malley v. Continental Life Insurance Company, Theodore Rassieur, Intervener,
This case is based on the same record and must be ruled on the same facts as the Rassieur case, since a preferred allowance for attorney fees and expenses in the dissolution suit was claimed on the same theory as in that case. Therefore, our ruling in the Rassieur case is decisive of this case. We hold that Mr. Pace is not entitled to have his claim against the insurance company preferred over those of other creditors.
The judgment is reversed. Ferguson and Bradley, CC., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
121 S.W.2d 850 (O'Malley v. Continental Life Insurance) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.