Oliver v. State
This text of 124 S.W. 637 (Oliver v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
This appeal was prosecuted from a judgment of conviction rendered in the County Court of Taylor County some time in the early part of 1909, convicting appellant for intimidating one Garrett Cooper by threatening words and acts of violence and intimidation by the firing of guns. The record shows ■ that the court adjourned on the 6th day of March, 1909. What purports to be a statement of facts was filed and approved on the 19th day of May, 1909, forty-three days after the adjournment of the term. We are not at liberty under the law to consider such statement of facts.
Bill of exceptions Ho. 2, which relates to the cross-examination of *51 appellant’s wife, does not appear from the record ever to have been filed, and, of course, can not> therefore, be considered.
Bill of exceptions Ho. 1 complains of a verbal charge of the court, and excepts to same because the court charged the jury with reference to the use of threatening words, for the reason, as it is claimed, that the information charges that the offense was committed by the firing of guns. This exception is not justified by the record which charges intimidation to have been accomplished by the use of “threatening words and acts of violence and intimidation by the firing of guns.”
Finding no error in the record, the judgment of conviction is affirmed.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
124 S.W. 637, 58 Tex. Crim. 50, 1910 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 36, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/oliver-v-state-texcrimapp-1910.