Pendleton v. State
This text of 26 S.W.2d 240 (Pendleton v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinions
The offense is selling intoxicating liquor; the punishment confinement in the penitentiary for one year.
A.witness for the state testified that he bought two pints of whiskey from appellant. Testifying in his own behalf, appellant denied that he had sold the state’s witness any whiskey and stated that he was at his mother’s home' in the country at the time the witness claimed he bought whiskey from him in a restaurant in Gainesville. Appellant further offered evidence to the effect that the state’s witness entertained feelings of hatred toward him on account of previous trouble. We deem the evidence sufficient to support the conviction.
Appellant brings forward three bills of exception, which do not appear to have been filed in the trial court. Bills of exception which do not appear to have been filed cannot be considered on appeal. Oliver v. State, 124 S. W. 637; Martinez v. State, 40 S. W. 280. *596 The state’s motion objecting to the consideration of the bills of exception must be sustained.
The judgment is affirmed.
Affirmed.
The foregoing opinion of the Commission of Appeals has been examined by the Judges of the Court of Criminal Appeals and approved by the Court.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
26 S.W.2d 240, 114 Tex. Crim. 595, 1930 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 253, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pendleton-v-state-texcrimapp-1930.