McCleary v. State

36 S.W.2d 166, 117 Tex. Crim. 237, 1930 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 961
CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas
DecidedNovember 12, 1930
DocketNo. 13658.
StatusPublished
Cited by4 cases

This text of 36 S.W.2d 166 (McCleary v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
McCleary v. State, 36 S.W.2d 166, 117 Tex. Crim. 237, 1930 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 961 (Tex. 1930).

Opinions

LATTIMORE, Jugde.

— Conviction for transporting intoxicating liquor; punishment, one year in the penitentiary.

Appellant’s motion for new trial was overruled on March 15, 1930, and as a part of the order then made the court granted to appellant “the statutory time” in which to file his bills of exception. Under the terms of Art. 760, C. C. P., the statutory time for filing such bills is thirty days from the adjournment of the trial term of the court. Said term ended March 22, 1930. The bills of exception therein appear to have been filed May 13, 1930. There appears in the record an undated order extending the time for filing such bills. There is no showing in the record either by any file mark upon this extension order, or any other showing that this order was made within thirty days after the adjournment of court. The trial court is not authorized to extend the time for filing bills of exception after the time already allowed, either by order or by statute, has expired. We can not consider these bills of exception in this condition. Rocha v. State, 115 Texas Crim. Rep., 342, 27 S. W. (2d) 823.

The officers found appellant with eight or nine quarts of whisky in his car. The defensive theory was that same was being transported for medicinal purposes, and the law applicable was fully and fairly submitted in the charge. The jury have passed on the issues .of fact and decided them adversely to appellant.

The judgment will be affirmed.

Affirmed.

Hawkins, J., absent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

White v. State
117 S.W.2d 450 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1938)
Moore v. State
71 S.W.2d 531 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1934)
Logan v. State
45 S.W.2d 625 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1931)
Traylor v. State
36 S.W.2d 506 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1930)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
36 S.W.2d 166, 117 Tex. Crim. 237, 1930 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 961, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mccleary-v-state-texcrimapp-1930.