Crosby v. State
This text of 263 S.W. 916 (Crosby v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinions
— The offense is the transportation of intoxicating liquor; punishment fixed at confinement in the penitentiary for a period of one year.
The State’s Attorney objects to the consideration of the statement of facts and bill of exceptions for the reason that neither is shown to have been filed in the trial court. Unless they were filed papers and were filed within the time prescribed by law, this court would be unauthorized to consider them. The record fails to show their filing. See Childress v. State, 92 Texas Crim. Rep., 215, 241 S. W. Rep., 1029; Oliver v. State, 58 Texas Crim. Rep., 50.
In the absence of bills of exceptions and statement of facts which may be considered, the record reveals nothing for review.
The judgment is affirmed.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
263 S.W. 916, 98 Tex. Crim. 75, 1923 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 910, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/crosby-v-state-texcrimapp-1923.