Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Derryberry

561 N.E.2d 926, 54 Ohio St. 3d 107, 1990 Ohio LEXIS 1291
Ohio Supreme Court·Decided October 17, 1990·No. No. 90-826·Published·Cited by 6 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Having thoroughly reviewed the record, we agree with the board’s findings of misconduct. We also agree with the board’s recommendation, to which neither party has objected. Accordingly, respondent is hereby ordered suspended from the practice of law in Ohio for two years, but he is to be credited for the time he has served under our order of August 31, 1987. Costs taxed to respondent.

Judgment accordingly.

Moyer, C.J., Sweeney, Holmes, Douglas, Wright, H. Brown and Resnick, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Derryberry, 561 N.E.2d 926, 54 Ohio St. 3d 107, 1990 Ohio LEXIS 1291 (Ohio 1990).

561 N.E.2d 926 (Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Derryberry) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Disciplinary Counsel v. Fusco
2025 Ohio 5397 (Ohio Supreme Court, 2025)
Disciplinary Counsel v. Derryberry.
2017 Ohio 8767 (Ohio Supreme Court, 2017)
Disciplinary Counsel v. Pappas
2014 Ohio 3676 (Ohio Supreme Court, 2014)
Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Derryberry
565 N.E.2d 539 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1990)