Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Derryberry

565 N.E.2d 539, 56 Ohio St. 3d 602, 1990 Ohio LEXIS 1905
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Derryberry. Read the opinion of the Court — 54 Ohio St. 3d 107
Ohio Supreme Court·Decided December 21, 1990·No. No. 90-826·Published

Opinion

This cause came on for further consideration upon the filing of the application for reinstatement of respondent, Quentin M. Derryberry II.

The court coming now to consider its order of October 17,1990, suspending respondent from the practice of law for a period of two years pursuant [603] to Gov. Bar R. V(7)(c), with credit for time served under the order of August 31, 1987, finds that respondent has substantially complied with that order and with the provisions of Gov. Bar R. V(24). Therefore,

IT IS ORDERED by the court that Quentin M. Derryberry II be, and hereby is, reinstated to the practice of law in the state of Ohio.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that respondent comply with the registration requirements of Gov. Bar R. VI.

(For earlier case, see [1990], 54 Ohio St. 3d 107, 561 N.E. 2d 926.)

Moyer, C.J., Sweeney, Holmes, Douglas, Wright, H. Brown and Resnick, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Derryberry, 565 N.E.2d 539, 56 Ohio St. 3d 602, 1990 Ohio LEXIS 1905 (Ohio 1990).

565 N.E.2d 539 (Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Derryberry) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Derryberry
561 N.E.2d 926 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1990)