Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Bell

530 N.E.2d 404, 39 Ohio St. 3d 276, 1988 Ohio LEXIS 359
CourtOhio Supreme Court
DecidedNovember 9, 1988
DocketNo. D.D. 84-25
StatusPublished
Cited by4 cases

This text of 530 N.E.2d 404 (Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Bell) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Bell, 530 N.E.2d 404, 39 Ohio St. 3d 276, 1988 Ohio LEXIS 359 (Ohio 1988).

Opinions

Per Curiam.

Having thoroughly reviewed the entire record before us, we agree with the board’s recommendation. While petitioner has already been precluded from practicing law for four years,1 the gravity of his misconduct continues to persuade us that he is unworthy of the public’s trust. The petition for reinstatement is denied.

Petition denied.

Moyer, C.J., Locher, Holmes, Wright and H. Brown, JJ., concur. Sweeney and Douglas, JJ., dissent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Bell
584 N.E.2d 742 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1992)
Cincinnati Bar Ass'n v. Joseph
572 N.E.2d 681 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1991)
Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Woods
552 N.E.2d 647 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1990)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
530 N.E.2d 404, 39 Ohio St. 3d 276, 1988 Ohio LEXIS 359, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/office-of-disciplinary-counsel-v-bell-ohio-1988.