Cincinnati Bar Ass'n v. Joseph

572 N.E.2d 681, 60 Ohio St. 3d 57, 1991 Ohio LEXIS 1167
CourtOhio Supreme Court
DecidedMay 29, 1991
DocketNo. 90-2536
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 572 N.E.2d 681 (Cincinnati Bar Ass'n v. Joseph) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Cincinnati Bar Ass'n v. Joseph, 572 N.E.2d 681, 60 Ohio St. 3d 57, 1991 Ohio LEXIS 1167 (Ohio 1991).

Opinions

Per Curiam.

We have reviewed the evidence, findings, and recommendations. We modify the sanction recommended by the board. Accordingly, we indefinitely suspend respondent from the practice of law and tax costs to him. He may petition for reinstatement, under Gov. Bar R. V(25), two years after his indefinite suspension that was effective May 3, 1989.

Judgment accordingly.

Moyer, C.J., Holmes, Wright, H. Brown and Resnick, JJ., concur. Sweeney and Douglas, JJ., dissent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cincinnati Bar Ass'n v. Joseph
599 N.E.2d 275 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1992)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
572 N.E.2d 681, 60 Ohio St. 3d 57, 1991 Ohio LEXIS 1167, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cincinnati-bar-assn-v-joseph-ohio-1991.