Cincinnati Bar Ass'n v. Joseph

572 N.E.2d 681, 60 Ohio St. 3d 57, 1991 Ohio LEXIS 1167
Ohio Supreme Court·Decided May 29, 1991·No. No. 90-2536·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinions

Per Curiam.

We have reviewed the evidence, findings, and recommendations. We modify the sanction recommended by the board. Accordingly, we indefinitely suspend respondent from the practice of law and tax costs to him. He may petition for reinstatement, under Gov. Bar R. V(25), two years after his indefinite suspension that was effective May 3, 1989.

Judgment accordingly.

Moyer, C.J., Holmes, Wright, H. Brown and Resnick, JJ., concur. Sweeney and Douglas, JJ., dissent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cincinnati Bar Ass'n v. Joseph, 572 N.E.2d 681, 60 Ohio St. 3d 57, 1991 Ohio LEXIS 1167 (Ohio 1991).

572 N.E.2d 681 (Cincinnati Bar Ass'n v. Joseph) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Cincinnati Bar Ass'n v. Joseph
599 N.E.2d 275 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1992)