Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Hock

522 N.E.2d 543, 36 Ohio St. 3d 177, 1988 Ohio LEXIS 102
Ohio Supreme Court·Decided April 27, 1988·No. D.D. No. 87-23·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

This court finds that respondent violated the aforementioned Disciplinary Rules and hereby adopts the board’s recommendation. Accordingly, respondent is ordered suspended from the practice of law in Ohio for two years. Costs taxed to respondent.

Judgment accordingly.

Moyer, C.J., Sweeney, Locher, Holmes, Douglas, Wright and H. Brown, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Hock, 522 N.E.2d 543, 36 Ohio St. 3d 177, 1988 Ohio LEXIS 102 (Ohio 1988).

522 N.E.2d 543 (Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Hock) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Hock
555 N.E.2d 930 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1990)
Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Bell
530 N.E.2d 404 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1988)
Disciplinary Counsel v. Hock, No. 9-87-B
38 Ohio St. 3d 718 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1988)