Dayton Bar Ass'n v. Callahan

522 N.E.2d 542, 36 Ohio St. 3d 179, 1988 Ohio LEXIS 98
Ohio Supreme Court·Decided April 27, 1988·No. D.D. No. 87-19·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

This court finds that respondent violated the aforementioned Disciplinary Rules indicated by the board. We also find the board's recommendation to be an appropriate sanction in this situation. Accordingly, respondent is hereby suspended from the practice of law in Ohio for one year from March 18, 1987. Costs taxed to respondent.

Judgment accordingly.

Moyer, C.J., Sweeney, Locher, Holmes, Douglas, Wright and H. Brown, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Dayton Bar Ass'n v. Callahan, 522 N.E.2d 542, 36 Ohio St. 3d 179, 1988 Ohio LEXIS 98 (Ohio 1988).

522 N.E.2d 542 (Dayton Bar Ass'n v. Callahan) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Bell
530 N.E.2d 404 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1988)
Dayton Bar Ass'n v. Callahan
525 N.E.2d 490 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1988)