Nunan v. Valentine

23 P. 713, 83 Cal. 588, 1890 Cal. LEXIS 734
CourtCalifornia Supreme Court
DecidedApril 28, 1890
DocketNo. 12663
StatusPublished
Cited by18 cases

This text of 23 P. 713 (Nunan v. Valentine) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Nunan v. Valentine, 23 P. 713, 83 Cal. 588, 1890 Cal. LEXIS 734 (Cal. 1890).

Opinion

Beatty, C. J.

— In this case the appellants move to

dismiss their own appeal, upon the ground that the judgment appealed from has been satisfied.

The motion is opposed by parties who claim to have succeeded to the rights of the original plaintiff, and who ask to be substituted as respondents, upon the ground that the alleged satisfaction of the judgment was entered in fraud of their rights.

A number of affidavits have been filed relating to this controversy, but we do not think this the proper forum for its determination. A dismissal of the appeal will simply have the effect of affirming the judgment, and remitting the questions as to the persons entitled to enjoy the fruits of it, and as to whether or not it has' been satisfied, to the superior court, where they ought to be tried. We do not decide these questions, but we see no reason to deny the motion.

Appeal dismissed, with costs to respondent.

Thornton, J., Sharpstein, J., McFarland, J., and Fox, J., concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Carlson v. Flathead County
293 P.2d 279 (Montana Supreme Court, 1955)
Hames v. City of Polson
215 P.2d 950 (Montana Supreme Court, 1950)
Roosevelt County v. State Board of Equalization
162 P.2d 887 (Montana Supreme Court, 1945)
Grady v. City of Livingston
141 P.2d 346 (Montana Supreme Court, 1943)
Judith Basin County Ex Rel. Vralsted v. Livingston
298 P. 356 (Montana Supreme Court, 1931)
Jones v. Cooney
263 P. 429 (Montana Supreme Court, 1928)
Franzke v. Fergus County
245 P. 962 (Montana Supreme Court, 1926)
Stange v. Esval
215 P. 807 (Montana Supreme Court, 1923)
Missoula Street Railway Co. v. City of Missoula
130 P. 771 (Montana Supreme Court, 1913)
State ex rel. Stuewe v. Hindson
120 P. 485 (Montana Supreme Court, 1912)
Cook v. Civil Service Commission
117 P. 662 (California Supreme Court, 1911)
State ex rel. Quintin v. Edwards
99 P. 940 (Montana Supreme Court, 1908)
Yegen v. Board of County Commissioners
85 P. 740 (Montana Supreme Court, 1906)
Williams v. Board of Commissioners
28 Mont. 360 (Montana Supreme Court, 1903)
Castle v. Bannock County
67 P. 35 (Idaho Supreme Court, 1901)
State v. Ryan
83 N.W. 865 (North Dakota Supreme Court, 1900)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
23 P. 713, 83 Cal. 588, 1890 Cal. LEXIS 734, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/nunan-v-valentine-cal-1890.