North Pacific Steamship Co. v. Guarisco

Court of Appeals of Oregon

North Pacific Steamship Co. v. Guarisco

619 P.2d 1306, 49 Or. App. 331, 1980 Ore. App. LEXIS 3712

CourtCourt of Appeals of Oregon

DecidedNovember 17, 1980

DocketNo. 420-628, CA 13184

StatusPublished

Cited by5 cases

This text of 619 P.2d 1306 (North Pacific Steamship Co. v. Guarisco) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Oregon primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

North Pacific Steamship Co. v. Guarisco, 619 P.2d 1306, 49 Or. App. 331, 1980 Ore. App. LEXIS 3712 (Or. Ct. App. 1980).

Pincite

Opinion

WARREN, J.

In this action at law for fraud, a companion case to the Creditor’s Bill in Equity involving the identical parties (see North Pacific Steamship Co. v. Guarisco, (CA 13405), 49 Or App 335, 619 P2d 1302 (1980), plaintiff appeals from the granting of summary judgment for defendants. The trial court in the equity case found that fraud was not proved against defendants and advised the parties that that finding would collaterally estop plaintiff in this case. Thereupon, defendants moved for summary judgment. We reverse and remand.

Because the companion case has been reversed and remanded for dismissal for lack of personal jurisdiction over defendants, the decree in the equity case is now a nullity. Therefore, there can be no collateral estoppel effect on this case, and the entry of summary judgment cannot stand.

Defendants contend that if the summary judgment is not sustained, the judgment dismissing the case should nevertheless be sustained for lack of personal jurisdiction over defendants. In its second amended complaint, plaintiff alleged that certain misrepresentations and material non-disclosures were made on behalf of the group of all defendants dining the original contract negotiations between the plaintiff and Pyramid Bulkcarriers, Inc. (PBC), in Oregon. These acts were alleged to be part of a continuous fraudulent course of conduct intended to be relied upon by plaintiff, which resulted in unrecoverable monetary loss when PBC reneged on the contract and was rendered insolvent by actions of defendants. If proven, those allegations are sufficient to make out a cause of action arising, in part at least, from the commission of a tortious act in Oregon within the meaning of former ORS 14.035(1)(b). State ex rel Academy Press v. Beckett, 282 Or 701, 716, 581 P2d 496 (1978).

Reversed and remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

WARREN, J.

In this action at law for fraud, a companion case to the Creditor’s Bill in Equity involving the identical parties (see North Pacific Steamship Co. v. Guarisco, (CA 13405), 49 Or App 335, 619 P2d 1302 (1980), plaintiff appeals from the granting of summary judgment for defendants. The trial court in the equity case found that fraud was not proved against defendants and advised the parties that that finding would collaterally estop plaintiff in this case. Thereupon, defendants moved for summary judgment. We reverse and remand.

Because the companion case has been reversed and remanded for dismissal for lack of personal jurisdiction over defendants, the decree in the equity case is now a nullity. Therefore, there can be no collateral estoppel effect on this case, and the entry of summary judgment cannot stand.

Defendants contend that if the summary judgment is not sustained, the judgment dismissing the case should nevertheless be sustained for lack of personal jurisdiction over defendants. In its second amended complaint, plaintiff alleged that certain misrepresentations and material non-disclosures were made on behalf of the group of all defendants dining the original contract negotiations between the plaintiff and Pyramid Bulkcarriers, Inc. (PBC), in Oregon. These acts were alleged to be part of a continuous fraudulent course of conduct intended to be relied upon by plaintiff, which resulted in unrecoverable monetary loss when PBC reneged on the contract and was rendered insolvent by actions of defendants. If proven, those allegations are sufficient to make out a cause of action arising, in part at least, from the commission of a tortious act in Oregon within the meaning of former ORS 14.035(1)(b). State ex rel Academy Press v. Beckett, 282 Or 701, 716, 581 P2d 496 (1978).

Reversed and remanded.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

619 P.2d 1306, 49 Or. App. 331, 1980 Ore. App. LEXIS 3712, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/north-pacific-steamship-co-v-guarisco-orctapp-1980.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack