Norse v. City of Santa Cruz
This text of 629 F.3d 966 (Norse v. City of Santa Cruz) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Robert NORSE, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
CITY OF SANTA CRUZ; Christopher Krohn, individually and in his official capacity as Mayor of the City of Santa Cruz; Tim Fitzmaurice; Keith A. Sugar; Emily Reilly; Ed Porter; Scott Kennedy; Mark Primack, individually and in their official capacities as Members of the Santa Cruz City Council; Loran Baker, individually and in his official capacity as Sergeant of the Santa Cruz Police Department; Steven Clark, Defendants-Appellees.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
David John Beauvais, Oakland, CA, Kathleen Elizabeth Wells, Esquire, Law Office of Kate Wells, Santa Cruz, CA, for Plaintiff-Appellant.
George J. Kovacevich, Esquire, Atchison, Barisone & Condotti A. Professional Corporation, Santa Cruz, CA, for Defendants-Appellees.
ORDER
KOZINSKI, Chief Judge:
Upon the vote of a majority of nonrecused active judges, it is ordered that this case be reheard en banc pursuant to Circuit Rule 35-3. The three-judge panel opinion shall not be cited as precedent by or to any court of the Ninth Circuit.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
629 F.3d 966, 2010 WL 5097749, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/norse-v-city-of-santa-cruz-ca9-2010.