Norse v. City of Santa Cruz

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Norse v. City of Santa Cruz. Read the opinion of the Court — 629 F.3d 966
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided March 12, 2010·No. 07-15814·Published

Opinion

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

ROBERT NORSE,  Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CITY OF SANTA CRUZ; CHRISTOPHER KROHN, individually and in his official capacity as Mayor of the City of Santa Cruz; TIM No. 07-15814 FITZMAURICE; KEITH A. SUGAR; EMILY REILLY; ED PORTER; SCOTT  D.C. No. CV-02-01479-RMW KENNEDY; MARK PRIMACK, individually and in their official ORDER capacities as Members of the Santa Cruz City Council; LORAN BAKER, individually and in his official capacity as Sergeant of the Santa Cruz Police Department; STEVEN CLARK, Defendants-Appellees.  Filed March 12, 2010

ORDER

KOZINSKI, Chief Judge:

Upon the vote of a majority of nonrecused active judges, it is ordered that this case be reheard en banc pursuant to Circuit Rule 35-3. The three-judge panel opinion shall not be cited as precedent by or to any court of the Ninth Circuit.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Norse v. City of Santa Cruz, (9th Cir. 2010).

Norse v. City of Santa Cruz (Norse v. City of Santa Cruz) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.