National Labor Relations Board v. Clark & Lewis Co.

274 F.2d 817, 45 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2775, 1960 U.S. App. LEXIS 5354
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
DecidedFebruary 17, 1960
Docket17963
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 274 F.2d 817 (National Labor Relations Board v. Clark & Lewis Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
National Labor Relations Board v. Clark & Lewis Co., 274 F.2d 817, 45 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2775, 1960 U.S. App. LEXIS 5354 (5th Cir. 1960).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Substantial evidence supports the Board’s finding that respondent interfered with, restrained, and coerced its employees in the exercise of their rights under Section 7 of the National Labor *818 Relations Act, 29 U.S.C.A. § 157 thereby violating Section 8(a) (1) of said Act, 29 U.S.C.A. § 158(a) (1). The Board properly concluded that respondent failed to bargain in good faith with the duly certified Union, thereby violating Section 8(a) (5) and (1) of said Act. Brooks v. N.L.R.B., 1954, 348 U.S. 96, 75 S.Ct. 176, 99 L.Ed. 125; N.L.R.B. v. Sanson Hosiery Mills, 5 Cir., 1952, 195 F.2d 350. The Board’s order is therefore

Enforced.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Puerto Rico Labor Relations Board v. Metropolitan Bus Authority
91 P.R. 484 (Supreme Court of Puerto Rico, 1964)
Junta de Relaciones del Trabajo v. Autoridad Metropolitana de Autobuses
91 P.R. Dec. 500 (Supreme Court of Puerto Rico, 1964)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
274 F.2d 817, 45 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2775, 1960 U.S. App. LEXIS 5354, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/national-labor-relations-board-v-clark-lewis-co-ca5-1960.