National Labor Relations Board v. Clark & Lewis Co.

274 F.2d 817, 45 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2775, 1960 U.S. App. LEXIS 5354
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided February 17, 1960·No. 17963·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Substantial evidence supports the Board’s finding that respondent interfered with, restrained, and coerced its employees in the exercise of their rights under Section 7 of the National Labor *818 Relations Act, 29 U.S.C.A. § 157 thereby violating Section 8(a) (1) of said Act, 29 U.S.C.A. § 158(a) (1). The Board properly concluded that respondent failed to bargain in good faith with the duly certified Union, thereby violating Section 8(a) (5) and (1) of said Act. Brooks v. N.L.R.B., 1954, 348 U.S. 96, 75 S.Ct. 176, 99 L.Ed. 125; N.L.R.B. v. Sanson Hosiery Mills, 5 Cir., 1952, 195 F.2d 350. The Board’s order is therefore

Enforced.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

National Labor Relations Board v. Clark & Lewis Co., 274 F.2d 817, 45 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2775, 1960 U.S. App. LEXIS 5354 (5th Cir. 1960).

274 F.2d 817 (National Labor Relations Board v. Clark & Lewis Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Puerto Rico Labor Relations Board v. Metropolitan Bus Authority
91 P.R. 484 (Supreme Court of Puerto Rico, 1964)
Junta de Relaciones del Trabajo v. Autoridad Metropolitana de Autobuses
91 P.R. Dec. 500 (Supreme Court of Puerto Rico, 1964)