Natasha Hiller v. Money Source Incorporated

District Court, D. Arizona·Decided June 25, 2026·No. 2:23-cv-00235·Unknown

Opinion

1 WO 2 3 4 5 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

9 Natasha Hiller, No. CV-23-00235-PHX-JJT

10 Plaintiff, ORDER

11 v.

12 Money Source Incorporated,

13 Defendant. 14 15 At issue is Plaintiff’s Unopposed Motion for Preliminary Approval of Class Action 16 Settlement (Doc. 104). After reviewing the Motion and attached documents, the Court 17 makes the following findings: 18 1. The Court has subject matter jurisdiction over this matter pursuant to 28 19 U.S.C. § 1331 and 47 U.S.C. § 227(b)(3) and has personal jurisdiction over the Parties and 20 the Settlement Class Members. 21 2. Upon a preliminary fairness evaluation, the proposed Settlement Agreement 22 (1) appears to be the product of serious, informed, non-collusive negotiations, (2) has no 23 obvious deficiency, (3) does not improperly grant preferential treatment to class 24 representatives or segments of the class, and (4) falls within the range of possible approval. 25 Horton v. USAA Cas. Ins. Co., 266 F.R.D. 360, 363 (D. Ariz. 2009). 26 3. Upon a preliminary review, the proposed class is numerous, shares at least 27 one common question of law or fact, the claims or defenses of the representative parties 28 1 are typical of the claims or defenses of the class, and the representative parties will fairly 2 and adequately protect the interests of the class, pursuant to Rule 23(a). 3 4. Upon a preliminary review, the questions of law or fact common to class 4 members predominate over questions affecting individual members and a class action is 5 superior to other available methods for the fair and efficient adjudication of the controversy 6 pursuant to Rule 23(b). 7 5. The proposed Settlement Agreement relief provided—a $1.5 million non- 8 reversionary settlement fund—is fair, reasonable, and adequate taking into account, inter 9 alia, the costs, risk, and delay of further litigation, trial and appeal, the alleged harm to 10 Settlement Class Members, the proposed method of distributing payments to the Settlement 11 Class, and the absence of any agreement required to be identified under Rule 23(e)(3). 12 6. The Court will likely be able to approve the Settlement under Fed. R. Civ. P. 13 23(e)(2) and to finally certify the Settlement Class for purposes of judgment on the 14 Settlement. 15 7. The content of the Notice and proposed Notice Plan attached to the 16 Settlement Agreement at docket entry 104-1 (“Agreement”), meets the requirements of due 17 process under the United States Constitution and Rule 23, and such Notice Plan—which 18 includes (i) direct letter notice, (ii) direct email notice, (iii) setting up a toll-free telephone 19 number; and (iv) establishing a Settlement Website at the web address of 20 www.moneysourceTCPAclassaction.com, where Settlement Class Members can view the 21 full Agreement, the detailed long-form notice, and other key case documents. 22 8. The content of the Notice and proposed Notice Plan is adequate and will give 23 the Settlement Class Members sufficient information to enable them to make informed 24 decisions as to the Agreement, including whether to object and whether to opt out. 25 9. The content of the Notice clearly and concisely states in plain, easily 26 understood language, inter alia: (a) the nature of the case; (b) the definition of the 27 Settlement Class; (c) the class claims and issues; (d) that a Settlement Class Member may 28 enter an appearance through an attorney if the member so desires; (e) that the Court will 1 exclude from the Settlement Class any member who timely and validly requests exclusion; 2 (f) the time and manner for objecting to the Agreement or requesting exclusion; and (g) the 3 binding effect of a class judgment on Settlement Class Members under Rule 23(c)(3). 4 IT IS ORDERED granting Plaintiff’s Unopposed Motion for Preliminary Approval 5 of Class Action Settlement (Doc. 104) and additionally ordering as follows: 6 10. The Court preliminarily approves the Agreement and the terms embodied 7 therein pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 23(e)(1). Unless defined herein, all defined terms in this 8 Order shall have the meanings ascribed to them in the Agreement attached to Plaintiff’s 9 Motion at docket entry 104-1. 10 11. In compliance with the Class Action Fairness Act of 2005, 28 U.S.C. § 1715, 11 Defendant shall promptly provide written notice of the Agreement to the appropriate 12 authorities if it has not already done so. 13 12. The Court amends, pursuant to Rule 23, the definition of the certified class 14 for the purpose of settlement as follows (“the Settlement Class”):

15 All persons throughout the United States or its territories (1) to 16 whom Defendant placed, or caused to be placed, a call, (2) directed to a number assigned to a cellular telephone service 17 and that appears on the document produced at TMS005442, (3) 18 in connection with which Defendant used an artificial or prerecorded voice, (4) after the called party requested that 19 Defendant stop placing telephone calls using an artificial or 20 prerecorded voice to their cellular telephone, as recorded in Defendant’s business records, (5) from February 6, 2019 21 through May 7, 2025. 22 13. The Court appoints Natasha Hiller as Class Representative for the Settlement 23 Class and re-affirms and re-designates as Class Counsel for the Settlement Class Max S. 24 Morgan, Esq., of the Weitz Firm, LLC, 1515 Market Street #1100, Philadelphia, PA 19102, 25 and Chris R. Miltenberger, Esq. of the Law Office of Chris R. Miltenberger, PLLC, 1360 26 N. White Chapel, Suite 200, Southlake, TX 76092-4322. 27 . . . 28 . . . 1 NOTICE AND INITIAL ADMINISTRATION 2 14. The Court approves the proposed Notice Plan as set forth in Section 7-9 of 3 the Agreement and the contents of the Notice (Doc. 104-1). 4 15. The Court appoints Atticus Administration LLC as the Administrator for the 5 Settlement and directs Atticus to carry out all the duties and responsibilities of the 6 Administrator as specified in the Class Action Settlement Agreement and herein 7 16. No later than thirty (30) days from the date of this Order (“Notice Date”), 8 the Administrator shall substantially complete (i) mailing Notice via first class mail and 9 (ii) sending email Notice to Settlement Class Members. In the event that any Notices are 10 returned as non-deliverable, the Claim Administrator shall promptly re-mail any Notices 11 that are returned as non-deliverable with a forwarding address to such forwarding address. 12 17. No later than the Notice Date, the Administrator shall maintain and 13 administer a dedicated Settlement Website and set up a toll-free telephone number for 14 receiving toll-free calls related to the Settlement. 15 18. In consultation with the Administrator, Defendant will fund the initial 16 settlement administration costs and notice costs with payment to the Settlement Fund not 17 later than the Notice Date. 18 19. Plaintiff, in consultation with the Administrator, will cause the settlement 19 fund to be invested in FDIC-insured, interest-bearing account(s) for the benefit of 20 Settlement Class Members. 21 20. The Court authorizes the Settlement Administrator to expend such funds to 22 pay notice and administration costs necessary to effectuate the approval process as well as 23 any incidental taxes or tax expenses as set forth in the Agreement and supervise and 24 administer the notice procedure. 25 21.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Natasha Hiller v. Money Source Incorporated, (D. Ariz. 2026).

Natasha Hiller v. Money Source Incorporated (Natasha Hiller v. Money Source Incorporated) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Horton v. Usaa Casualty Insurance
266 F.R.D. 360 (D. Arizona, 2009)