FEDERAL · 28 U.S.C. · Chapter 114

Notifications to appropriate Federal and State officials

28 U.S.C. § 1715

This text of 28 U.S.C. § 1715 (Notifications to appropriate Federal and State officials) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
28 U.S.C. § 1715.

Text

(a)Definitions.—
(1)Appropriate federal official.—In this section, the term "appropriate Federal official" means—
(A)the Attorney General of the United States; or
(B)in any case in which the defendant is a Federal depository institution, a State depository institution, a depository institution holding company, a foreign bank, or a nondepository institution subsidiary of the foregoing (as such terms are defined in section 3 of the Federal Deposit Insurance Act (12 U.S.C. 1813)), the person who has the primary Federal regulatory or supervisory responsibility with respect to the defendant, if some or all of the matters alleged in the class action are subject to regulation or supervision by that person.
(2)Appropriate state official.—In this section, the term "appropriate State official"

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

IUE-CWA v. General Motors Corp.
238 F.R.D. 583 (E.D. Michigan, 2006)
39 case citations
Pollard v. Remington Arms Co.
320 F.R.D. 198 (W.D. Missouri, 2017)
35 case citations
In re Oil Spill
295 F.R.D. 112 (E.D. Louisiana, 2013)
23 case citations
Chakejian v. Equifax Information Services, LLC
275 F.R.D. 201 (E.D. Pennsylvania, 2011)
16 case citations
Weber v. Government Employees Insurance
262 F.R.D. 431 (D. New Jersey, 2009)
15 case citations
Noll v. eBay, Inc.
309 F.R.D. 593 (N.D. California, 2015)
9 case citations
Harlan v. Transworld Systems, Inc.
302 F.R.D. 319 (E.D. Pennsylvania, 2014)
1 case citations
Carlson v. Home Depot USA Inc
(W.D. Washington, 2023)
Ohring v. UniSea Inc
(W.D. Washington, 2023)
Nacif v. Athira Pharma Inc
(W.D. Washington, 2023)
Hunichen v. Atonomi LLC
(W.D. Washington, 2024)
Rose v. Sandy
(S.D. West Virginia, 2024)
Charles v. Color Factory, LLC
(S.D. New York, 2024)

Source Credit

History

(Added Pub. L. 109–2, §3(a), Feb. 18, 2005, 119 Stat. 7.)

Editorial Notes

Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries

Effective Date
Section applicable to any civil action commenced on or after Feb. 18, 2005, see section 9 of Pub. L. 109–2, set out as an Effective Date of 2005 Amendment note under section 1332 of this title.

Editorial Notes

Amendments
1999—Pub. L. 106–113, div. B, §1000(a)(9) [title IV, §4732(b)(15)(A)], Nov. 29, 1999, 113 Stat. 1536, 1501A–584, which directed the amendment of item 1744 by substituting "United States Patent and Trademark Office" for "Patent Office", was executed by making the substitution for "patent office" to reflect the probable intent of Congress.
1996—Pub. L. 104–199, §2(b), Sept. 21, 1996, 110 Stat. 2419, added item 1738C.
1994—Pub. L. 103–383, §3(b), Oct. 20, 1994, 108 Stat. 4066, added item 1738B.
1980—Pub. L. 96–611, §8(b), Dec. 28, 1980, 94 Stat. 3571, added item 1738A.
1976—Pub. L. 94–550, §1(b), Oct. 18, 1976, 90 Stat. 2534, added item 1746.
1964—Pub. L. 88–619, §§5(b), 6(b), 7(b), Oct. 3, 1964, 78 Stat. 996, substituted "official documents" for "documents generally; copies" in item 1741, inserted "[Repealed]" in item 1742, and substituted "documents" for "specifications and drawings" in item 1745.
1951—Act Aug. 28, 1951, ch. 351, §2, 65 Stat. 206, inserted "; photographic copies" in item 1732.
1949—Act May 24, 1949, ch. 139, §92(a), 63 Stat. 103, struck out item 1745 "Printed copies of patient specifications and drawings" and renumbered item 1746 as 1745.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
28 U.S.C. § 1715, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/usc/28/1715.