Mulvaney v. Rivair Flying Service, Inc.

744 F.2d 1438
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit·Decided October 3, 1984·No. No. 83-1246·Published·Cited by 73 cases

Opinions

McWILLIAMS, Circuit Judge,

dissents:

I respectfully dissent and would adhere to the Order and Judgment of the panel heretofore filed in the instant case on March 13, 1984. Insofar as the record is concerned, the trial judge imposed sanctions without giving any reason. The trial judge did state that the amount of the “fine” or “sanction” was based on a statement made by the Chief Justice in a speech at an A.B.A. meeting.

In sum, the record does not support the action taken by the trial judge, and, in my view, the majority has filled in the gaps.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Mulvaney v. Rivair Flying Service, Inc., 744 F.2d 1438 (10th Cir. 1984).

744 F.2d 1438 (Mulvaney v. Rivair Flying Service, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related