Mulvaney v. Rivair Flying Service, Inc.
This text of 744 F.2d 1438 (Mulvaney v. Rivair Flying Service, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinions
dissents:
I respectfully dissent and would adhere to the Order and Judgment of the panel heretofore filed in the instant case on March 13, 1984. Insofar as the record is concerned, the trial judge imposed sanctions without giving any reason. The trial judge did state that the amount of the “fine” or “sanction” was based on a statement made by the Chief Justice in a speech at an A.B.A. meeting.
In sum, the record does not support the action taken by the trial judge, and, in my view, the majority has filled in the gaps.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
744 F.2d 1438, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mulvaney-v-rivair-flying-service-inc-ca10-1984.