FEDERAL · 28 U.S.C. · Chapter 123
Counsel's liability for excessive costs
28 U.S.C. § 1927
Title28 — Judiciary and Judicial Procedure
Chapter123 — FEES AND COSTS
This text of 28 U.S.C. § 1927 (Counsel's liability for excessive costs) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
28 U.S.C. § 1927.
Text
Any attorney or other person admitted to conduct cases in any court of the United States or any Territory thereof who so multiplies the proceedings in any case unreasonably and vexatiously may be required by the court to satisfy personally the excess costs, expenses, and attorneys' fees reasonably incurred because of such conduct.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Smith v. Detroit Federation of Teachers, Local 231
829 F.2d 1370 (Sixth Circuit, 1987)
In Re Girardi
611 F.3d 1027 (Ninth Circuit, 2010)
Dotson v. Bravo
202 F.R.D. 559 (N.D. Illinois, 2001)
United States v. Monson
636 F.3d 435 (Eighth Circuit, 2011)
Nelson H. Weade v. Trailways of New England, Inc.
325 F.2d 1000 (D.C. Circuit, 1963)
Higginbotham v. KCS International Inc.
202 F.R.D. 444 (D. Maryland, 2001)
Alexander v. Federal Bureau of Investigation
192 F.R.D. 25 (District of Columbia, 2000)
Glasser Ex Rel. Kirschner v. Blixseth
649 F. App'x 506 (Ninth Circuit, 2016)
United States Ex Rel. Lee v. Corinthian Colleges
652 F. App'x 503 (Ninth Circuit, 2016)
Blaimauer v. Omniglow Corp.
499 F. Supp. 2d 437 (S.D. New York, 2007)
Veerasikku Bommiasamy v. Rakesh Parikh
633 F. App'x 351 (Seventh Circuit, 2016)
Gamage v. Nevada Ex Rel. Board of Regents of Higher Education
647 F. App'x 787 (Ninth Circuit, 2016)
Barry Nakell v. John Barth, Sr.
648 F. App'x 324 (Fourth Circuit, 2016)
Frank Coniglio, Jr. v. Chesapeake Exploration, L.L.C.
648 F. App'x 540 (Sixth Circuit, 2016)
Covington v. German Wise Dental LLC
(W.D. Washington, 2023)
Scheve v. The Moody Foundation
(Fifth Circuit, 2001)
Cadlerock III, LLC v. Harry Brown & Co., LLC
(Eleventh Circuit, 2018)
Mendis v. BMW of North America LLC
(W.D. Washington, 2024)
HDT Bio Corp v. Emcure Pharmaceuticals Ltd
(W.D. Washington, 2023)
Watters v. Parviz
(W.D. Washington, 2023)
Source Credit
History
(June 25, 1948, ch. 646, 62 Stat. 957; Pub. L. 96–349, §3, Sept. 12, 1980, 94 Stat. 1156.)
Editorial Notes
Historical and Revision Notes
Based on title 28, U.S.C., 1940 ed., §829 (R.S. §982).
Word "personally" was inserted upon authority of Motion Picture Patents Co. v. Steiner et al., 1912, 201 F. 63, 119 C.C.A. 401. Reference to "proctor" was omitted as covered by the revised section.
See definition of "court of the United States" in section 451 of this title.
Changes were made in phraseology.
Editorial Notes
Amendments
1980—Pub. L. 96–349 substituted judicial authorization to require attorneys to satisfy excess costs, expenses, and attorneys' fees reasonably incurred because of multiplication of proceedings for such prior authority to impose liability for increased costs based on multiplication of proceedings.
Based on title 28, U.S.C., 1940 ed., §829 (R.S. §982).
Word "personally" was inserted upon authority of Motion Picture Patents Co. v. Steiner et al., 1912, 201 F. 63, 119 C.C.A. 401. Reference to "proctor" was omitted as covered by the revised section.
See definition of "court of the United States" in section 451 of this title.
Changes were made in phraseology.
Editorial Notes
Amendments
1980—Pub. L. 96–349 substituted judicial authorization to require attorneys to satisfy excess costs, expenses, and attorneys' fees reasonably incurred because of multiplication of proceedings for such prior authority to impose liability for increased costs based on multiplication of proceedings.
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
28 U.S.C. § 1927, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/usc/28/1927.