Mr. & Mrs. Henry Plaisance, Jr. v. Texaco, Inc.

Fifth Circuit

Mr. & Mrs. Henry Plaisance, Jr. v. Texaco, Inc.

954 F.2d 266, 1992 U.S. App. LEXIS 1712

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

DecidedFebruary 11, 1992

Docket90-3183

StatusPublished

This text of 954 F.2d 266 (Mr. & Mrs. Henry Plaisance, Jr. v. Texaco, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Mr. & Mrs. Henry Plaisance, Jr. v. Texaco, Inc., 954 F.2d 266, 1992 U.S. App. LEXIS 1712 (5th Cir. 1992).

Pincite

Opinion

954 F.2d 266

Mr. & Mrs. Henry PLAISANCE, Jr., Plaintiffs-Appellants,
v.
TEXACO, INC., et al., Defendants-Appellees.

No. 90-3183.

United States Court of Appeals,
Fifth Circuit.

Feb. 11, 1992.

Joseph J. Weigand, Jr., Weigand, Weigand & Meyer, Houma, La., for plaintiffs-appellants.

David E. Faure and John D. Fitzmorris, Jr., New Orleans, La., for Texaco.

J. Ralph White and Robert B. Acomb, Jr., Jones, Walker, Waechter, Poitevent, Carrere & Denegre, New Orleans, La., for Crosby Marine.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the the Eastern District of Louisiana; A.J. McNamara, Judge.

(Opinion August 9, 1991, 5 Cir., 1991, 937 F.2d 1004)

Before POLITZ, Chief Judge, KING, GARWOOD, JOLLY, HIGGINBOTHAM, DAVIS, JONES, SMITH, WIENER, BARKSDALE, E. GARZA and DeMOSS, Circuit Judges.*

BY THE COURT:

A majority of the Judges in active service, on the Court's own motion, having determined to have this case reheard en banc,

IT IS ORDERED that this case shall be reheard by the Court en banc with oral argument on a date hereafter to be fixed. The Clerk will specify a briefing schedule for the filing of supplemental briefs.

*

Judge Duhe is recused, and therefore did not participate in this decision

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI