Morgan v. State
696 So. 2d 850, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 3095, 1997 WL 148807
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided April 2, 1997·No. No. 95-03671·Published·Cited by 3 cases
Opinion
Kenneth Morgan challenges his judgment and sentence for petit theft and resisting arrest without violence. We affirm the judgment and sentence, but remand the case to correct a scrivener’s error. Appellant pleaded not guilty, but the judgment indicates he entered a plea of no contest. Therefore, we remand the ease to the trial judge to correct the judgment to reflect appellant’s not guilty plea and his conviction after a jury trial.
Affirmed and remanded with directions.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Morgan v. State, 696 So. 2d 850, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 3095, 1997 WL 148807 (Fla. Ct. App. 1997).
696 So. 2d 850 (Morgan v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Nichols v. State
159 So. 3d 340 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2015)
D.R. v. State
714 So. 2d 1141 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1998)
Sullivan v. State
701 So. 2d 657 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1997)