Nichols v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Nichols v. State

159 So. 3d 340, 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 3392, 2015 WL 1035491

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedMarch 11, 2015

DocketNo. 2D13-3320

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 159 So. 3d 340 (Nichols v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Nichols v. State, 159 So. 3d 340, 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 3392, 2015 WL 1035491 (Fla. Ct. App. 2015).

Pincite

Opinion

SLEET, Judge.

Jeremy Christian Nichols challenges his convictions and sentences for burglary of an unoccupied dwelling and grand theft in circuit court case number 29-2012-CF-18339 and possession of a controlled substance, possession of cannabis, and possession of drug paraphernalia in circuit court case number 29-2012-CF-18340. We affirm Nichols’ judgments and sentences without comment but remand for correction of a scrivener’s error. In case number 29-2012-CF-18339, Nichols was convicted after jury trial. In case number 29-2012-CF-18340, Nichols pleaded guilty to all three counts. The judgments, however, do not indicate how the cases came before the circuit court for disposition. The State concedes error. As such, we remand to the trial court with instructions to correct [341]*341the judgments to reflect Nichols’ conviction after jury trial in case 18339 and entry of a guilty plea in case 18340. See Morgan v. State, 696 So.2d 850 (Fla. 2d DCA 1997).

Affirmed.

SILBERMAN and KELLY, JJ., Concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

SLEET, Judge.

Jeremy Christian Nichols challenges his convictions and sentences for burglary of an unoccupied dwelling and grand theft in circuit court case number 29-2012-CF-18339 and possession of a controlled substance, possession of cannabis, and possession of drug paraphernalia in circuit court case number 29-2012-CF-18340. We affirm Nichols’ judgments and sentences without comment but remand for correction of a scrivener’s error. In case number 29-2012-CF-18339, Nichols was convicted after jury trial. In case number 29-2012-CF-18340, Nichols pleaded guilty to all three counts. The judgments, however, do not indicate how the cases came before the circuit court for disposition. The State concedes error. As such, we remand to the trial court with instructions to correct [341]*341the judgments to reflect Nichols’ conviction after jury trial in case 18339 and entry of a guilty plea in case 18340. See Morgan v. State, 696 So.2d 850 (Fla. 2d DCA 1997).

Affirmed.

SILBERMAN and KELLY, JJ., Concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

159 So. 3d 340, 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 3392, 2015 WL 1035491, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/nichols-v-state-fladistctapp-2015.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack