D.R. v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

D.R. v. State

714 So. 2d 1141, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 8517, 1998 WL 396200

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in D.R. v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 5626 →

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided July 17, 1998·No. No. 96-02730·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

D.R. challenges a delinquency order adjudicating him guilty of several burglaries. We affirm the adjudications but remand to correct a scrivener’s error on the order entered in circuit court case number 95-941A. The order indicates D.R. entered a guilty plea when, in fact, he was found guilty after a bench trial. Therefore, the order must be [1142]*1142corrected on remand. See Morgan v. State, 696 So.2d 850 (Fla. 2d DCA 1997).

PARKER, C.J., and QUINCE and WHATLEY, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

D.R. challenges a delinquency order adjudicating him guilty of several burglaries. We affirm the adjudications but remand to correct a scrivener’s error on the order entered in circuit court case number 95-941A. The order indicates D.R. entered a guilty plea when, in fact, he was found guilty after a bench trial. Therefore, the order must be [1142]*1142corrected on remand. See Morgan v. State, 696 So.2d 850 (Fla. 2d DCA 1997).

PARKER, C.J., and QUINCE and WHATLEY, JJ., concur.

D.R. v. State, 714 So. 2d 1141, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 8517, 1998 WL 396200 (Fla. Ct. App. 1998).

Pincite

714 So. 2d 1141 (D.R. v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related