D.R. v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

D.R. v. State

714 So. 2d 1141, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 8517, 1998 WL 396200

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedJuly 17, 1998

DocketNo. 96-02730

StatusPublished

This text of 714 So. 2d 1141 (D.R. v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

D.R. v. State, 714 So. 2d 1141, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 8517, 1998 WL 396200 (Fla. Ct. App. 1998).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

D.R. challenges a delinquency order adjudicating him guilty of several burglaries. We affirm the adjudications but remand to correct a scrivener’s error on the order entered in circuit court case number 95-941A. The order indicates D.R. entered a guilty plea when, in fact, he was found guilty after a bench trial. Therefore, the order must be [1142]*1142corrected on remand. See Morgan v. State, 696 So.2d 850 (Fla. 2d DCA 1997).

PARKER, C.J., and QUINCE and WHATLEY, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

D.R. challenges a delinquency order adjudicating him guilty of several burglaries. We affirm the adjudications but remand to correct a scrivener’s error on the order entered in circuit court case number 95-941A. The order indicates D.R. entered a guilty plea when, in fact, he was found guilty after a bench trial. Therefore, the order must be [1142]*1142corrected on remand. See Morgan v. State, 696 So.2d 850 (Fla. 2d DCA 1997).

PARKER, C.J., and QUINCE and WHATLEY, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

714 So. 2d 1141, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 8517, 1998 WL 396200, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dr-v-state-fladistctapp-1998.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack